On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 4:34:43 PM jaybytez wrote:
> I was reading the specification section on WebParam.Mode.INOUT
>
> /The direction in which the parameter is flowing.
> Valid values are:
>
> WebParam.Mode.IN
> WebParam.Mode.OUT
> WebParam.Mode.INOUT
>
> Default value is WebP
I was reading the specification section on WebParam.Mode.INOUT
/The direction in which the parameter is flowing.
Valid values are:
WebParam.Mode.IN
WebParam.Mode.OUT
WebParam.Mode.INOUT
Default value is WebParam.Mode.IN.
If you specify WebParam.Mode.OUT or WebParam.Mode.INOUT, then t
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 10:48:42 AM santoshk wrote:
> Hi, I have a web service that is exposed via http as well as jms. What would
> be the best way to identify the transport mechanism used so I can different
> action based on it, e.g. error handling?
If you inject the WebServiceContext (or ca
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 3:12:11 PM jp_listero wrote:
> ok.
>
> but using cxf apache ?
>
> I'am following http://cxf.apache.org/docs/how-do-i-develop-a-client.html
> where I set user & password ?
If you have the port/proxy, just use:
((BindingProvider)proxy).getRequestContext()
.put(
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 9:18:59 PM David Karlsen wrote:
> Bah - rpc/encoded
> Den 31. aug. 2011 21:18 skrev "David Karlsen"
>
> følgende:
> > But not tøv/encoded? Thursting to kick out axis1...
Nope. Pretty much nothing even semi-modern supports rpc/encoded anymore.
There was SOME work
Bah - rpc/encoded
Den 31. aug. 2011 21:18 skrev "David Karlsen"
følgende:
> But not tøv/encoded? Thursting to kick out axis1...
> Den 31. aug. 2011 17:22 skrev "Daniel Kulp" følgende:
>> On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 6:21:17 PM Raj Floyd wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It seems CXF uses document/literal b
But not tøv/encoded? Thursting to kick out axis1...
Den 31. aug. 2011 17:22 skrev "Daniel Kulp" følgende:
> On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 6:21:17 PM Raj Floyd wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems CXF uses document/literal by default. Is there any other
style/use
>> that CXF offers? If so, what is the api?
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 10:44:34 PM Raj Floyd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If Coloc is enabled on the client side, it will detect whether the server is
> local or not. Some questions:
>
> 1. What if I do not use Coloc feature and still make my client and server
> run in same JVM. Will it work?
Yes. It w
Thanks Dan!
I'll do my best
Cheers
Alessio
On 08/31/2011 05:19 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> I forgot to announce this a couple weeks ago... better late than never. :-)
>
> I'm very happy to report that the CXF PMC has voted and Alessio has accepted
> to become CXF's newest PMC member. Alessio
On Tuesday, August 30, 2011 11:55:16 PM dstainer wrote:
> Thanks for the quick response Dan.
>
> I had one additional question about request/response wrapper objects. With
> objects coming across the wire you can create immutable objects with the use
> of @XmlAccessorType(XmlAccessType.NONE) and p
On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 6:21:17 PM Raj Floyd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems CXF uses document/literal by default. Is there any other style/use
> that CXF offers? If so, what is the api?
CXF also supports rpc/literal as well. It's not used that often though.
-
Daniel Kulp
dk...@apache.org
htt
I forgot to announce this a couple weeks ago... better late than never. :-)
I'm very happy to report that the CXF PMC has voted and Alessio has accepted
to become CXF's newest PMC member. Alessio has been a major contributor to
CXF's JAX-WS 2.1 and 2.2 implementations and has been instrument
See the SOAPBinding class-level annotation, example:
@SOAPBinding(parameterStyle = ParameterStyle.WRAPPED, style =
Style.DOCUMENT, use = Use.LITERAL)
-Original Message-
From: Raj Floyd [mailto:rajfl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 8:51 AM
To: users@cxf.apache.org
Subject:
Hi,
It seems CXF uses document/literal by default. Is there any other style/use
that CXF offers? If so, what is the api?
Thanks
Raj
Hi Christian-
So I've thought about your approach, with regards to forward compatibility
and disabling of schema validation, and I think it might be the best I can
do. However, before I throw in the towel I'd like to ask you a couple of
additional questions.
1) What if enabling/disabling client s
15 matches
Mail list logo