Hi,
I had my webapp running using Spring 3 with CXF 2.2.8 and decided to upgrade
to CXF 2.3.1.
Now the webapp doesn't startup correct anymore. It gives the following
exception:
Caused by:
org.springframework.beans.factory.BeanCurrentlyInCreationException: Error
creating bean with name 'campaignM
In the xml response, when sending data that would make an invalid xml, that
data is wrapped in CDATA.
Is it possible to disable this default wrapping? I would like to handle that
with some custom adapters.
The problem I have now is that I would like to wrap some data always in
CDATA, even though i
In my SOAP request I have a Calendar value that is not required:
Are these 2 cases differently handled? Is it correct that the first one is
an empty string "" and the second one is null?
Can this be configured in some way?
--
View this message in context:
http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/JAX
Ah yes, simple but effective. Thanks for all your help the past week.
Greetz,
Ronald
dkulp wrote:
>
> On Friday 18 June 2010 5:24:01 am Ronald Pieterse wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> I got it working! It turned out to be as simple as giving all the
>> webresults the
Hi Dan,
I got it working! It turned out to be as simple as giving all the webresults
the same name ('response') and in case of an exception I wrap the response
with an extra
wrapper class also called 'response'.
Now all the messages arrive in the same format at the client - whether they
originat
Hi Dan,
That helped me a lot, thanks! I have a custom response object so the path
from fault chain to normal chain is working like a charm. There is only one
issue left that showed up with the fix ;-)
The call I do is getByContactDatabaseId which, if correct should return the
following xml:
htt
Hi Dan,
The first part of your reply was pretty straightforward. I created my own
version of OutgoingChainInterceptor and at the end of handleMessage
I did:
message.getInterceptorChain().pause();
This stops the current chain, right? Now I still created my new response,
put that inside t
nabble.com/Response-object-is-null-td28859579.html
Thanx so far.
Ronald
Ronald Pieterse wrote:
>
> In the mean time I've been playing with an interceptor trying to do the
> thing I want and I succeeded in removing the Exception from the response.
> Now I also tried to put some ne
Hi people.
I have a problem I need to tackle pretty soon so I hope someone can give
some pointers here.
My client would like to see normal responses, even when exceptions have
occurred.
I'm trying to change the thrown exceptions into custom response objects
which are not extending Fault.
So actu
In the mean time I've been playing with an interceptor trying to do the thing
I want and I succeeded in removing the Exception from the response. Now I
also tried to put some new content (a string) in the message but that does
not go well. When I debug I see that the Exception resided in the
'defa
ker child element that would be an instance of your invoker.
> Something like:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Wednesday 02 June 2010 3:30:03 am Ronald Pieterse wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to replace all Faults with my own resp
like:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Wednesday 02 June 2010 3:30:03 am Ronald Pieterse wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to replace all Faults with my own response object to keep
>> the
>> Faults from my clients. So I mean not wrap them
Hi,
I would like to replace all Faults with my own response object to keep the
Faults from my clients. So I mean not wrap them into another object but
really replace the Fault object with my own Response.
What would be the best way to do this? I read something about extending the
JAXWSMethodInvok
Hello.
I am wondering the following: I know that it is possible to use a custom
class extending JAXWSMethodInvoker
to manipulate the returned Fault object, by overriding the createFault()
method.
Is it also possible to completely change the response object? I would like
to replace the Fault wit
Hi Daniel,
well, if that is the case than that's useless for me. It's a really big
response so we probably need to work with an attachment. The idea of using
an attachment and getting the objects through the inputstream lazily would
be better in this case. I didn't get it working though.
Btw, I s
InputStream that pulled objects
> from your ResultSetExtractor and put that into the DataHandler, so the
> data
> would never be sitting all in one place.
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Ronald Pieterse
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm all SOAPy and of course you'
;
> This all assumes that you are responsible for data format management; none
> of the data bindings that I am familiar with can handle any concept of
> incrementally unmarshalling objects and handing them to you.
>
> People have whole object caching systems for this sort of thing
Hi,
I have a question about streaming with CXF. I'm already using Attachments
which works fine but now I need something even more powerful.
I have a huge amount of objects that i retrieve from the database in a
'streaming' fashion (using Spring's ResultSetExtractor) and now I want to
stream them
I have been thinking about this for some time now as well until I came across
this issue :-) Is there already a solution like you described in CXF or is a
wrapper class still necessary at this moment?
Thnx.
Ronald
dkulp wrote:
>
>
> In all honesty, the ONLY way to do this with JAX-WS is to wr
:20 am Ronald Pieterse wrote:
>> In my webservice I would like to be able to accept a list of different
>> types of objects. So the client would send a list of different objects
>> and
>> the server would then be able to see which object is which.
>> I understand that JAXB
, ObjectTwo.class
}))
If I use List<Object> I also get an exception:
java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xerces.dom.ElementNSImpl
Ronald
dkulp wrote:
>
> On Monday 01 December 2008 4:26:20 am Ronald Pieterse wrote:
>> In my webservice I would like to be able to accept a list of dif
It's a JAX-WS (SOAP) service.
Sergey Beryozkin-3 wrote:
>
> Is it a JAXWS or JAXRS service you're referring to ?
>
> Cheers, Sergey
>
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> In my webservice I would like to be able to accept a list of different
>> types
>> of objects. So the client would send a list of differen
Hello.
In my webservice I would like to be able to accept a list of different types
of objects. So the client would send a list of different objects and the
server would then be able to see which object is which.
I understand that JAXB does not handle interfaces. Is there maybe another
way to ge
reference with the request, then waits.
> Quite a bit more work and essentially does what the case 1 above does.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Thursday 09 October 2008 10:27:42 am Ronald Pieterse wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> In my service doing some time consuming stuff (rea
Hello.
In my service doing some time consuming stuff (reading email and handling
them) thus the connection is timing-out before I can start sending the
response. What way would I need to walk to keep the connection open? Is
there any way CXF can help in this?
Thnx,
Ronald
--
View this message i
Glen Mazza wrote:
>
>
> Ronald Pieterse wrote:
>>
>> However this uses classes from the server since I have no client code
>> generated here. You don't want to have your clients do this, right?
>>
>
> You can split out the JAX-WS artifacts into
I have a couple of questions and hope that someone will be able to answer
them fairly quickly. I'm in a bit of a rush here...
I have an MTOM enabled service (CXF 2.1.1) and want to use my client code to
receive attachments. The service is implemented correctly I think, since
the following code wo
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Sunday 03 August 2008 9:58:26 am Ronald Pieterse wrote:
>> Thanx for the response, Dan.
>>
> ...
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/upgrade-from-2.0.5-to-2.0.8-%3A%3A-%3Cjaxws%3AoutInterceptors%3E-throws-exception-tp18769193p18890677.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Glen Mazza wrote:
>
>
> Ronald Pieterse wrote:
>>
>> UnsupportedOperationException from the I am
>> using.
>> If I take the outInterceptors and outFaultInterceptors stuff out it works
>> fine.
>> Is there something I should have done or changed?
n
>
>
> On Aug 1, 2008, at 2:59 AM, Ronald Pieterse wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Until this morning I was using CXF version 2.0.5-incubator for my
>> services
>> (yes I know, I should check for upgrades more often ;-) and decided
>> I wante
Hello.
Until this morning I was using CXF version 2.0.5-incubator for my services
(yes I know, I should check for upgrades more often ;-) and decided I wanted
to upgrade to 2.0.8. btw, I'm using it with spring 2.5.5.
It all went smooth - no changes needed at all - until I made a service call.
The
31 matches
Mail list logo
