On Wed January 27 2010 5:31:52 pm rduhard wrote:
> I haven't had a chance to create a sample demonstrating the problem yet but
> I did a little bit of digging...
>
> I've found that if you have BOTH the wsa:addressing feature in your Spring
> configuration and wsaw:UsingAddressing in your WSDL, i
g defined in my WSDL:binding
>>>
>>>
>>> and also have the following within my spring endpoint configuration:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there a way to do this in CXF and I'm maybe missing something or is
>>> this
>>> the expected behaviour?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Rebecca
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dk...@apache.org
>> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>>
>>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/CXF-return-fault-when-WS-Addressing-MAPs-are-not-present--tp26837662p27347975.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
nd I'm maybe missing something or is
>> this
>> the expected behaviour?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Rebecca
>>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dk...@apache.org
> http://www.dankulp.com/blog
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/CXF-return-fault-when-WS-Addressing-MAPs-are-not-present--tp26837662p26876361.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
This SOUND like a bug. If wsdl:required="true" is there, according to spec,
that implies that the addressing is required. Please log a bug and attach a
small test case if you can. (like modify the hello world or something)
Actually, you kind of have two bugs. The "required" bug and the
me
; Thanks,
> Rebecca
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/CXF-return-fault-when-WS-Addressing-MAPs-are-not-present--tp26837662p26837662.html
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
way to do this in CXF and I'm maybe missing something or is this
the expected behaviour?
Thanks,
Rebecca
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/CXF-return-fault-when-WS-Addressing-MAPs-are-not-present--tp26837662p26837662.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archi
