Re: how to determine/debug effective ws policy used?

2013-09-10 Thread Daniel Kulp
be a problem, but I could then run a series of extra tests and such for it. Dan Thanks, Jesse -Original Message- From: Jesse Pangburn Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 3:05 PM To: users@cxf.apache.org; Daniel Kulp Subject: RE: how to determine/debug effective ws policy used? Hi Dan, Just

RE: how to determine/debug effective ws policy used?

2013-09-10 Thread Jesse Pangburn
(find.dispatch.operation, Boolean.TRUE); thanks, Jesse -Original Message- From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dk...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 2:14 PM To: users@cxf.apache.org; Jesse Pangburn Subject: Re: how to determine/debug effective ws policy used? On Sep 9, 2013, at 6:57 PM

RE: how to determine/debug effective ws policy used?

2013-09-09 Thread Jesse Pangburn
: Wednesday, June 05, 2013 3:36 PM To: Daniel Kulp; users@cxf.apache.org Subject: RE: how to determine/debug effective ws policy used? Hi Dan, As always, thanks for your excellent help! That did work. However, there's a setting that I thought was supposed to take care of this issue in Dispatch

RE: how to determine/debug effective ws policy used?

2013-06-28 Thread Jesse Pangburn
To: Daniel Kulp; users@cxf.apache.org Subject: RE: how to determine/debug effective ws policy used? Hi Dan, As always, thanks for your excellent help! That did work. However, there's a setting that I thought was supposed to take care of this issue in Dispatch: disp.getRequestContext().put

RE: how to determine/debug effective ws policy used?

2013-06-05 Thread Jesse Pangburn
This appears to be a bug. I stepped through the debugger into the PolicyOutInterceptor's handle method and found the following in the BindingOperationInfo object: [BindingOperationInfo: {http://cxf.apache.org/jaxws/dispatch}Invoke] This is the default value which gets overridden at some point

Re: how to determine/debug effective ws policy used?

2013-06-05 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Jun 5, 2013, at 4:46 PM, Jesse Pangburn jesse.pangb...@infor.com wrote: This appears to be a bug. I stepped through the debugger into the PolicyOutInterceptor's handle method and found the following in the BindingOperationInfo object: [BindingOperationInfo: