Re: Complicated wrapping

apache.org>" < > users@felix.apache.org<mailto:users@felix.apache.org>> > Cc: Joe Adams mailto:joe.ad...@cmegroup.com>> > Subject: Re: Complicated wrapping > > doh' this isn't Karafs fault ... > > if you want to install two bundles that are no

Re: Complicated wrapping

org>" mailto:users@felix.apache.org>> Cc: Joe Adams mailto:joe.ad...@cmegroup.com>> Subject: Re: Complicated wrapping doh' this isn't Karafs fault ... if you want to install two bundles that are no osgi bundles you have the convenience of installing those non-osgi bu

Re: Complicated wrapping

ences through maven and then exposes the logging package? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Complicated-wrapping-tp5013411.html Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabbl

Re: Complicated wrapping

need to make a bundle that imports the dependences through maven and then exposes the logging package? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Complicated-wrapping-tp5013411.html Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabbl

Re: Complicated wrapping

h.logging.support. > > > >Would it be possible to wrap them both in a bundle using the wrap > >command in > >bundle, in a feature.xml file? > > > >Do I need a more complex scheme? Would I need to make a bundle that > >imports > >the dependences throug

Re: Complicated wrapping

me? Would I need to make a bundle that >imports >the dependences through maven and then exposes the logging package? > >Thanks! > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Complicated-wrapping-tp

Complicated wrapping

s the logging package? Thanks! -- View this message in context: http://apache-felix.18485.x6.nabble.com/Complicated-wrapping-tp5013411.html Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscri