It makes sense. My point was just about installing a bunch of bundles on
top of Felix to "mimic" what Karaf already provides.
Regards
JB
On 12/17/2014 03:39 PM, Milen Dyankov wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I use Karaf myself and I love it. And I'm fully with
you about easy/flexible/enterprise read
Hi Jochen,
In that case, for a 10 years container, what's the difference (in term
of changes and maintenance) between Felix Framework and Karaf Container ?
Regards
JB
On 12/17/2014 03:36 PM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
The problem with the easy/flexible/enterprise ready container on top
of the fr
To use a blueprint datasource in pure felix you would need to install
blueprint and its dependencies.
If you do not use blueprint for anything else then I would rather
publish the datasource using a simple bundle with just OSGi API.
Simply create and publish the DataSource in an Activator.
An a
Don't get me wrong, I use Karaf myself and I love it. And I'm fully with
you about easy/flexible/enterprise ready container statement. Just was
trying to answer the question according to my best knowledge without
pushing on my personal preferences.
Best,
Milen
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Jea
The problem with the easy/flexible/enterprise ready container on top
of the framework is, that a real lot of users (including me) cannot
use it, because their applications *must* run within a
difficult/inflexible/enterprise ready 10 years ago container. Or, in
other words: A solution must be availa
I agree, but Karaf is flexible enough to create your own custom
distribution, where you easily assembly what you need.
I know that some of you may think that OSGi is enough by itself, and a
container doesn't make sense, but I disagree about that. Providing an
easy/flexible/enterprise ready conta
Well if someone says he wants to use B instead of A, I assume he/she has
his reasons. That's why I tend to avoid answering like "just stay with A"
as it doesn't really help. Besides, you don't really need everything Karaf
comes with, in order to define and use datasources. Depends on the use case
o
Hi guys,
if at the end, you install the same bundles as in Karaf (where we also
bring some configuration and convenient commands), the question is why
not directly using Karaf ;)
Regards
JB
On 12/17/2014 02:44 PM, Milen Dyankov wrote:
You probably know this but just to make it clear - Karaf
You probably know this but just to make it clear - Karaf is not directly
comparable with Felix. It can use Felix or Equinox but it comes OOTB with
many bundles pre-installed. That is why your datasource "works" in Karaf.
It will work in Felix if you have appropriate bundles (that understand what
da
No I'm not saying that,
but if he expects to use blueprint xml definitions for a datasource he'll
need to put all those bundles back in again, in
the end he might end up with the Karaf-minimal distro so where is the point?
regards, Achim
2014-12-17 14:02 GMT+01:00 Neil Bartlett :
>
> Achim, are y
Achim, are you seriously saying that you need the complete Karaf stack just in
order to use a datasource?? That’s nuts.
RamaKrishna, what is the issue you’re having? If you have a datasource bundle
you can just install it in Felix and it will work. If not, please report the
errors you get.
Reg
Any reason not to stick to Karaf as your container as it uses Felix as its
framework?
Otherwise you'll need to re-assemble the complete stack that is used inside
Karaf.
So you'll need to add the blueprint bundles first, those can be found at
the Aries Project.
Now you'll need to make sure you have
Team,
I want to know how to configure datasource in Felix container. I have a
blueprint that contains datasource info, this i want to make work in Felix.
In Karaf when i put it in deploy folder it works perfectly. Am not getting
a direction as how to achive this in felix.
--
Cheers
RamaKrishna
13 matches
Mail list logo