Re: [libreoffice-users] Missing Currency?

Toki, On Sun, 2011-06-05 at 09:02 +0300, me sub wrote: > Hi, > > The problem that my country is not listed there, and only 5 arabic country > is listed in the local settings! > By the way, all arabic countries speaks one language, so I does not matter > which language to select, but the country

Re: [libreoffice-users] Missing Currency?

Hi, The problem that my country is not listed there, and only 5 arabic country is listed in the local settings! By the way, all arabic countries speaks one language, so I does not matter which language to select, but the country currency symbol important! *"add the language localizations for the

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base Field Defaut Disables Save

Le 04/06/11 17:41, Tom Davies a écrit : Hi all, Better off looking here first : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=libreoffice+database As you can see, there are a good number of Base bugs, many of which have are still unresolved since the very first releases of LibreOffice.

[libreoffice-users] Re: LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

I'm using Nabble to read this (much prefer forum style - mailing lists don't appear to have much benefit over forums nowadays), so I don't know any other way to post. Nick. Roland Hughes wrote: > > That's because you top-post where everybody instinctively looks. Had > you bottom-posted the e

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

That's because you top-post where everybody instinctively looks. Had you bottom-posted the email would have been ignored. On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 18:11 -0700, At0mic wrote: > OK thanks to all. Looks like the version change works without complaint in > Office 2010. I should also accept mea culpa i

[libreoffice-users] Re: LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

OK thanks to all. Looks like the version change works without complaint in Office 2010. I should also accept mea culpa in not reading the release notes first, as this would have exposed the problem to me earlier. I am amazed at how quickly responses came through though, impressive! Thankyou all.

Re: [libreoffice-users] error in menu for tools/language/for selection or for paragraph

OK I think I know a little more than what is stated below. Since English is what I have as my default language, if I do not have any non-English words in the text "selected", then I get the error. Now when I add text that is Spanish, the options gives me a number of different Spanish diction

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

Good work and interesting :) You can change which ODF Format Version LibreOffice uses by going to the "Tools" menu Tools - Options - "Load/Save" - General - "ODF Format Version" and change the drop-down from 1.2 Extended to 1.0/1.1. Thanks Dennis, regards all from Tom :) - Original Mes

[libreoffice-users] Re: Is this list unmoderated?

On 6/4/11 5:00 AM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: Or for the dozenth time... the project deploy a solution that makes everyone happy - a federated forum / list solution. Maybe you should make it. "almost" everyone happy". :: grin :: -- Ken Mac OS X 10.6.7 Firefox 3.6.17 Thunderbird 3.1

RE: [libreoffice-users] LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

I've looked into this. FOR THE ODT FILES ONLY: The problem is that Microsoft supports ODF 1.1. The later versions of LO (and OO.o) anticipate ODF 1.2 and by default use ODF 1.2-only features of the manifest in the ODT package. The Microsoft ODF 1.1 implementations do not recognize those fea

Re: [libreoffice-users] 3.4 install errors

It's a Ubuntu bug if I remember correctly. Something which got hosed with one of the updates having to do with fonts. A later update makes it go away. On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 01:00 -0700, Tinker wrote: > Doing a new install of 3.4 , 64 bit on Xubuntu I get these errors - > > > Processing trigge

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is this list unmoderated?

Not only that, but that group is also the only ones bottom posting. On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 21:10 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 11:05:45AM +0200, James Wilde wrote: > > > > Personally I think mailing lists are so last century and nerdy, and that we > > should be using a

[libreoffice-users] Re: LO 3.4.0 language pack for EN-US?

On 2011/06/04 12:48 PM bunk3m wrote: I was going to download v3.4.0 but the site shows "null" for the language pack (en-us). I checked the "Other ways to download" but couldn't find it. https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ shows LibO_3.4.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg 173 MB as being available

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

At0mic, On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 07:53 -0700, At0mic wrote: > The whole open source/proprietary war is pointless because each side uses > lies and hyperbole to win various arguments. The open source side is not > innocent of using FUD, sorry. Windows 7 is nice, better than most Linux > distros for d

Re: [libreoffice-users] 3.4 install errors

Tinker On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 01:00 -0700, Tinker wrote: > Doing a new install of 3.4 , 64 bit on Xubuntu I get these errors - > > > Processing triggers for shared-mime-info ... > Unknown media type in type 'all/all' > > Unknown media type in type 'all/allfiles' > > Unknown media type in type

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

- Original Message > From: Johnny Rosenberg > To: users@libreoffice.org > Sent: Sat, 4 June, 2011 20:27:51 > Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the >backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4? > > 2011/6/4 Regina Henschel : > > Hi Johnny, > > > > Johnny Ros

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re:

- Original Message > From: Ismael Caballero > To: users@libreoffice.org > Sent: Fri, 3 June, 2011 15:32:15 > Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: > > Jean-Christophe CUGNIERE free.fr> writes: > > > > > Hi, > > Hereunder is my problem, > > > > I have 3 computers in a samba network >

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

2011/6/4 Regina Henschel : > Hi Johnny, > > Johnny Rosenberg schrieb: >> >> 2011/6/4 Regina Henschel: > > [..] >>> >>> In OOo this can be done by the function N. Unfortunately the spec makes >>> it >>> "implemention defined" what N does with text. In OOo N returns 0 for >>> text, >>> which I think

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 3.4.0 language pack for EN-US?

Hi :) I think most of the language packs are inside the main download this time. I think US is the default language too. The 3.4.0 is for early adopters so it might be better to stay with 3.3.2 for now. Regards from Tom :) - Original Message > From: bunk3m > To: users@libreoffice

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 3.4.0 language pack for EN-US?

Hi "bunk3m", I was a little bit short in my answer. bunk3m schrieb: I was going to download v3.4.0 but the site shows "null" for the language pack (en-us). I checked the "Other ways to download" but couldn't find it. Where is it? Click on "Other ways" > "3.4.0" > Your OS. Depending on your O

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO 3.4.0 language pack for EN-US?

Hi "bunk3m", bunk3m schrieb: I was going to download v3.4.0 but the site shows "null" for the language pack (en-us). I checked the "Other ways to download" but couldn't find it. Where is it? There are no language pack, but Englisch helppacks http://www.libreoffice.org/download/ Click on "He

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

Hi Johnny, Johnny Rosenberg schrieb: 2011/6/4 Regina Henschel: [..] In OOo this can be done by the function N. Unfortunately the spec makes it "implemention defined" what N does with text. In OOo N returns 0 for text, which I think is useful. In LO it returns #VALUE although the help saws it w

[libreoffice-users] LO 3.4.0 language pack for EN-US?

I was going to download v3.4.0 but the site shows "null" for the language pack (en-us). I checked the "Other ways to download" but couldn't find it. Where is it? Thanks. Bunkem -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmas

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

2011/6/4 Regina Henschel : > Hi "prholland", > > prholland schrieb: >> >> The following screenshot is taken from a spreadsheet that previously >> showed >> "00:00" in LibreOffice 3.3.2, where LibreOffice 3.4.0 is now showing >> "#VALUE!" (NB: all the cells are formatted as Time values, and the "tex

[libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

Brian Barker wrote: > > One useful facility in this case is Value Highlighting. Go to View | > Value Highlighting or press Ctrl+F8. The font colour for text > (temporarily) becomes black, for numbers and other values blue, and > for formulae green. (Formulae should be no problem, since it's

Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

At 06:06 04/06/2011 -0700, Nobody Noname wrote: Actually I had never noticed that spreadsheets (all including Excel) ignore text values mixed with numbers. This worries me a lot! I work with 300.000+ line spreadsheets and if one line has a text value (because of a typo) I wouldn't notice that.

[libreoffice-users] Re: TDF - Novos membros em 31-05-2011

Boa noite, Furusho. A ordenação dos nomes na lista ainda é um mistério pra nós... Assim como outras coisas, não sabemos quais são os critérios pra isso. Sugiro que você pergunte sobre isso na lista webmaster@ ou na lista sc@. Abraço. Em 3 de junho de 2011 17:03, Vitorio Furusho escreveu: > Pess

[libreoffice-users] Re:

Jean-Christophe CUGNIERE free.fr> writes: > > Hi, > Hereunder is my problem, > > I have 3 computers in a samba network > - Dell7 under windows7 > - UbuntuT61 under ubuntu 11.04 > - thintkpadr60 with two partitions : > - Ubuntur60 under ubuntu 11.04 > - Sevenr60 under windows7 > They a

[libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

Michael D. Setzer II wrote: > > If you use count on a range it only counts numeric cells, but > counta counts numeric and non-empty cells, so if they don't give > the same results for the same range, there is an error? > Yes, that would work but it forces me to do this verification for each c

Re: [libreoffice-users] 3.4 install errors

Hi :) Good point. I hadn't noticed Xubuntu in large friendly letters at the top but just noticed the tiny mention of "winamp" which i didn't think worked even using Wine. Xubuntu has a boot-menu that includes 2 lines for each kernel. The 2nd ones have "recovery mode" at the end of their l

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

Hi, On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 17:02, At0mic wrote: > [...] > > But thank you for the Bugzilla link. It helped direct me to this: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37516 > > It's for the .doc problem. Looks like they don't consider a big fat warning > to be a blocking bug. Oh well, not li

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

In data 04 giugno 2011 alle ore 17:02:30, At0mic ha scritto: It's for the .doc problem. Looks like they don't consider a big fat warning to be a blocking bug. Oh well, not like I'm paying for LibreOffice. Can't complain right? Please file your complain in bugzilla. More users do it more

Re: [libreoffice-users] 3.4 install errors

Tom Davies writes: > Tinker wrote: >> >> Doing a new install of 3.4 , 64 bit on Xubuntu I get these errors - >> >> >> Processing triggers for shared-mime-info ... >> Unknown media type in type 'all/all' [...] >> Unknown media type in type 'interface/x-winamp-skin' >> >> Are these importan

[libreoffice-users] Impress and Hardware Acceleration

Hi LOers! I am having some trouble when switching to presentation mode (F5) and having some transparent fillings in my presentation. With the hardware acceleration on, they mostly look like grayish areas, although they have nice colourful fillings in editing mode. If I turn off the hardware accel

Re: [libreoffice-users] Save as (export) to Excel 2003/2007

Hi :) Is this still a problem? Have you been able to fix it? There might be another question related to this one now. Regards from Tom :) - Original Message > From: planas > To: users@libreoffice.org > Sent: Sat, 4 June, 2011 1:10:57 > Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Save as (expor

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Base Field Defaut Disables Save

Hi :) Have you already posted a bug-report about this or is there already one at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport It might be worth posting one even if you don't have time to search through for one. Triagers are quite smart about doing that and linking similar bugs together. Good lu

Re: [libreoffice-users] 3.4 install errors

Hi :) This is in Windows? There shouldn't be any errors although the one about winamp skins seems to be nothing to do with LibreOffice so i wonder if the rest are relevant or not. No idea, sorry :( Regards from Tom :) - Original Message > From: Tinker > To: users@libreoffice.org >

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

Ahh great to see you have a valid doc from 3.3.2 aswell as the wrong one from 3.4.0 at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37516 That might help the devs pinpoint the problem, hopefully. Imo it's fine to complain about a Free product especially if you complain to the right people so th

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

Hi :) It wasn't taken personally, don't worry. The important bit of the 1st mail was the link, i bracketed the rest ;) I think the bug is new. It might be producing the same result as a previous bug but it's not happened in 3.3.2 or 3.3.1 or even 3.3.0 afaik so it needs to be fixed. And

[libreoffice-users] Re: LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

BTW, don't take the above personally Tom. Wasn't directly at you personally. I'm just not a fan of reading rants when I've got a critical issue on my hands. But thank you for the Bugzilla link. It helped direct me to this: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37516 It's for the .doc prob

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

Hi :) Agreed, well mostly. I think filing a bug-report about it is important. Win7 is a huge improvement. Lol about the docX format coming out unflagged. As you know that is the one we usually have most trouble with. The old doc is usually fine except for a few pics and boxs moving around sl

[libreoffice-users] Re: LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

The whole open source/proprietary war is pointless because each side uses lies and hyperbole to win various arguments. The open source side is not innocent of using FUD, sorry. Windows 7 is nice, better than most Linux distros for desktop use in my opinion, and no-one is going to change my mind by

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

Hi :) Please file a bug-report http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport Oh, you know you can use it happily and safely. It's just MS trying to force people to buy their product by pretending that other things are suspicious. Why people continue to believe MS is beyond me. There are so m

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

Hi "prholland", prholland schrieb: The following screenshot is taken from a spreadsheet that previously showed "00:00" in LibreOffice 3.3.2, where LibreOffice 3.4.0 is now showing "#VALUE!" (NB: all the cells are formatted as Time values, and the "text" cells contain "-"): http://nabble.documen

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

On 4 Jun 2011 at 6:26, prholland wrote: Date sent: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 06:26:56 -0700 (PDT) From: prholland To: users@libreoffice.org Subject:[libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of Libre

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

On 4 Jun 2011 at 6:06, plino wrote: Date sent: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 06:06:55 -0700 (PDT) From: plino To: users@libreoffice.org Subject:[libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3

[libreoffice-users] Re: LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3023257/Test.odt Test.odt Just a simple .odt with the word Test in it. Should load fine in Writer, but complains for me in Word 2010. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/LO-Writer-3-4-0-basic-doc-odt-files-not-understoo

Re: [libreoffice-users] LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

At0mic ha scritto: Clicking OK asks if you want to recover the contents of the document. The recovered document is correct and uncorrupted. Can you post a sample document? I don't see such behavior. Regards, Gianluca -- Lettura gratuita o acquisto di libri e racconti di fantascienza, fantasy,

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

Hi :) Thanks PLO. Now that you have confirmed that is likely to be the issue i played around with "Format Cells". I couldn't get an ideal answer that shows a - even when the cell is empty but i could get one when the cell has 0 value. Select the range of cells and from the top menus select

[libreoffice-users] LO Writer 3.4.0 --- basic .doc/.odt files not understood properly by MS Office 2010

LibreOffice Writer 3.4.0 running under Windows 7 64-bit. Problem 1 reproduction - * Start Writer * Create a document and type in a few words, nothing special or extravagant * Save as an .odt file * Load into MS Office 2010 Error message: The file cannot be opened because there are problems with

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

Hello prholland, On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 06:26:56 -0700 (PDT) (your time) you said: > The following screenshot is taken from a spreadsheet that previously showed > "00:00" in LibreOffice 3.3.2, where LibreOffice 3.4.0 is now showing > "#VALUE!" (NB: all the cells are formatted as Time values, and the

[libreoffice-users] error in menu for tools/language/for selection or for paragraph

I found an issue with Tools>Language>For Selection or >For Paragraph. I am using 3.3.2 DEB 64-bit When I try to select a language to for a selected text or a paragraph, the link/option goes to the "Character menu" and to choose a background color. I have not tried this since 3.3.0 or 3.3.

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Workflow / vector graphics to LO / Impress

Ilja Gerhardt writes: > well, the issue is to include scientific graphs etc. from other programs > (plots, CAD, etc.) - the way to inkscape is quite straight forward. But > then from there further to LO is a pain (as described). Maybe other > people have similar issues and found a better way tha

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

Hi :) I think those empty cells (that now contain - ) might be causing the error. If you delete the - in just 1 row does that fix the formula to display correctly? I think number cells can be formatted to show a - mark if empty but 3.4 might have got confused and thought those - were keyed in

[libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

The following screenshot is taken from a spreadsheet that previously showed "00:00" in LibreOffice 3.3.2, where LibreOffice 3.4.0 is now showing "#VALUE!" (NB: all the cells are formatted as Time values, and the "text" cells contain "-"): http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n3023141/%23VALUE

[libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

Actually I had never noticed that spreadsheets (all including Excel) ignore text values mixed with numbers. This worries me a lot! I work with 300.000+ line spreadsheets and if one line has a text value (because of a typo) I wouldn't notice that. Is there any setting that triggers a warning (inst

Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

Hi :) I remember this happened in Excell at one point too. I vaguely remember there was some obscure setting that had suddenly been changed from previous updates/versions. I would post a bug-report and then start searching for it as it's not ideal default behaviour! Regards from Tom :) ---

Re: [libreoffice-users] database

Dear Peter In Vista can you find the "Add/remove programs"? In Xp and i think in Win7 it's in the Control Panel so hopefully it should be there in Vista also. This should help you remove the help package. You might have more luck with the "Clean disk-space" tool that 'should' be in somewher

Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

Sometimes I have found that the "#VALUE!" is because the number doesn't fit in the width of the cell. Making the width of the column has resolved the problem. *I doubt if the movie Black Swan was making fun of me in my Linux mascot guise!* On 4 June 2011 13:38, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) > I th

Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

On 04-06-2011 13:38, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) > I think "#VALUE!" appears when some duff value is trying to be shown, such as > trying to divide by 0 #DIV/0! ?? -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmas...@documentfou

Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

Hi :) I think "#VALUE!" appears when some duff value is trying to be shown, such as trying to divide by 0 or trying to add nonsensical values together such as word added to numbers and being shown in a cell formatted to show numbers. It's likely there is a tpyo somewhere, either in the formula

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is this list unmoderated?

On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 00:47 -0700, plino wrote: > Caesar wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:10:39 -0700, Robert Holtzman > >>Which is precisely the reason I dislike forums. Way too many brainless > >>questions from users (and I use the term loosely) who barely know how to > >>turn on

[libreoffice-users] 3.4 install errors

Doing a new install of 3.4 , 64 bit on Xubuntu I get these errors - Processing triggers for shared-mime-info ... Unknown media type in type 'all/all' Unknown media type in type 'all/allfiles' Unknown media type in type 'uri/mms' Unknown media type in type 'uri/mmst' Unknown media type in type

[libreoffice-users] Re: Base Field Defaut Disables Save

I'm suffering the same problem. OO Base 3.2 workd fine. Having upgraded to LO 3.3 (and tried OO 3.3), any "date" format field cannot have a default date set. My prior embedded HSQL database (from OO2.x, used in OO3.2) doesn't work - the set default date enters nonsense in the field, which obviously

Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

Hello prholland, On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 02:54:53 -0700 (PDT) (your time) you said: > In OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice 3.3 if you used =SUM() to find the total > of the numeric values in a row or column where some of the cells were > blank or just text, then it worked! Now I've just opened a spreadsh

[libreoffice-users] database

Dear Sir, I have Windows Vista Home Premium Service Pack 2 I was looking for a Database programme and chose your Libre Office 3.3.2 programme. I downloaded and installed the programe including the LibreOffice Help Pack in English. After some traing and use I decided this was just too complicated

Re: [libreoffice-users] Numbering help.

Hi Regina. On 2/06/11 6:02 AM, Steve Edmonds wrote: On 2/06/11 3:20 AM, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi Steve, Steve Edmonds schrieb: [long decription] The size of the outline numbering no longer changes to match the text. The outline numbering is fixed the same font, size, weight everywhere. My

[libreoffice-users] Re: Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

It must be a new feature :) I advise you to test 3.3 RC1 and update to 3.3 when it is released. Version 3.4 is not ready for real work as stated in the release announcement http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-Document-Foundation-announces-LibreOffice-3-4-0-tt3019206.html -- View this messag

Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

Hi Phil, To start with your subject line: must be, looking at the number of people that downloaded and tested betas etc. prholland wrote (04-06-11 11:54) In OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice 3.3 if you used =SUM() to find the total of the numeric values in a row or column where some of the cells

Re: [libreoffice-users] Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

On 4/06/11 9:54 PM, prholland wrote: In OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice 3.3 if you used =SUM() to find the total of the numeric values in a row or column where some of the cells were blank or just text, then it worked! Now I've just opened a spreadsheet with LibreOffice 3.4 and #VALUE! is appear

[libreoffice-users] Calc: Has anyone tested the backward-compatibility of LibreOffice 3.4?

In OpenOffice.org and LibreOffice 3.3 if you used =SUM() to find the total of the numeric values in a row or column where some of the cells were blank or just text, then it worked! Now I've just opened a spreadsheet with LibreOffice 3.4 and #VALUE! is appearing everywhere. Why the change? It bring

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Mailing list signature cutline

On 03-06-2011 21:31, PLO wrote: > Hello Luuk, > > On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:22:36 +0200 (your time) you said: > >>> Please feel free to email me off list if you want to [...snip...] > >> no, but thanks, i'm not really interested in a discussion about email >> clients, because they should simply do

Re: [libreoffice-users] Incredibly annoying highlight problem!

On 4/06/11 5:22 PM, Justin Guay wrote: Ok, for many labs for school I have to highlight my answers. There seems to be a bug where, after you click the color you want and the highlight icon, when you move the cursor down (onto the document itself), it moves the page all around. It's essentially

[libreoffice-users] Re: Is this list unmoderated?

Caesar wrote: > > On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:10:39 -0700, Robert Holtzman > >>Which is precisely the reason I dislike forums. Way too many brainless >>questions from users (and I use the term loosely) who barely know how to >>turn on their computer. > > +1 on that. They certainly

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is this list unmoderated?

On Fri, 3 Jun 2011 21:10:39 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote Re Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Is this list unmoderated?: >On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 11:05:45AM +0200, James Wilde wrote: >> >> Personally I think mailing lists are so last century and nerdy, and that we >> should be using a forum which non