Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: UNO with Libreoffice 5 (64-Bit, Win) and Java

2015-08-24 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 08/22/2015 02:47 PM, Aurelius Octavian wrote: With "Depends tool" do you mean the Depency Walker (depends.exe) ? http://www.dependencywalker.com/ I didn't find another tool which would sound similar to what you mentioned. Yes, that's what I meant. In any case, I fail to open my Java progra

Re: [libreoffice-users] LibreOffice 5.0 Review & Rating | PCMag.com

2015-08-24 Thread M Henri Day
2015-08-21 4:15 GMT+02:00 : > On 2015-08-20 22:10, toki wrote: > >> On 20/08/15 10:12, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> >> I should get a job writing these kinds of reviews >>> >> >> Why are you assuming that a human-being wrote the review? >> It has most of the hallmarks of a bot-written review. >>

[libreoffice-users] Re: UNO with Libreoffice 5 (64-Bit, Win) and Java

2015-08-24 Thread Aurelius Octavian
Thank you Stephan for the hint. Dependency's profiling the "soffice.bin" execution from within Java worked and I got a longer log. However, since I'm no C(++) or Windows programmer I wouldn't know where to search for a bug in the Java64->UNO->Libreoffice64 process. Would somebody like to take a

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: UNO with Libreoffice 5 (64-Bit, Win) and Java

2015-08-24 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 08/24/2015 02:28 PM, Aurelius Octavian wrote: Thank you Stephan for the hint. Dependency's profiling the "soffice.bin" execution from within Java worked and I got a longer log. However, since I'm no C(++) or Windows programmer I wouldn't know where to search for a bug in the Java64->UNO->Libre

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 5.0 Review & Rating | PCMag.com

2015-08-24 Thread toki
On 21/08/15 11:02, Pedro wrote: > I disagree that the UI is the biggest problem... The acid test is whether or not the UI passes or fails Section 508 criteria. Currently, LibO fails Section 508 criteria. (Draw fails everything. Impress fails most of the time.) jonathon -- To unsubscribe e-ma

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 5.0 Review & Rating | PCMag.com

2015-08-24 Thread M Henri Day
2015-08-24 16:36 GMT+02:00 toki : > On 21/08/15 11:02, Pedro wrote: > > > I disagree that the UI is the biggest problem... > > The acid test is whether or not the UI passes or fails Section 508 > criteria. > > Currently, LibO fails Section 508 criteria. > (Draw fails everything. Impress fails most

Re: [libreoffice-users] HEHELP!! Link not always working with yosemite/posted question in Ask page, profile showing 0 questions

2015-08-24 Thread Valter Mura
Il 23/08/2015 14:02, donabo...@libero.it ha scritto: Hi, I apologize if this is not the right place, but I am getting desperate: first, my question is NOT showing to the users in the Ask page after 2 days I posted. Here are the screenshot of the que

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 5.0 Review & Rating | PCMag.com

2015-08-24 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) I got the 4.0 article from the original link too even though i'm not in the southern hemisphere and don't have my monitor upside down either. Guess it is another Firefox issue. Even going to the author's page and clicking on the 5.0 link got me to the 4.0 review. Also the font size kept ju

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice 5.0 Review & Rating | PCMag.com

2015-08-24 Thread Tom Davies
Hi :) I think it is important to get some good comments in there quickly. It would be good to do this to any other articles about LibreOffice too. It is best to write more comments for articles that are properly pro-LibreOffice so that their authors get seen positively by whoever publishes such a