On 04/23/2015 10:47 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
MSO 2013
was the first that allowed people to save in strict but the resultant
files don't seem to be able to be opened in any version of MS Office.
Those files are probably write only. ;-)
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to:
Hi :)
Yeh, i don't know a good way around that :( other than the way you already
use! :))
People used to be quite happy with the idea of downloading Adobe Acrobat to
read Pdfs with. It used to be that almost any website that shared any kind
of document tended to only have them as Pdfs and also
Hi:
Thanks for your attention.
The fact with this file is that can't be supported by .XLS format, and my
coworkers doesn't work with LibO, and that is the only way I can use to
keep in touch with them and their jobs. It may be a pain .. ... ... ,
but while it work I'll keep using this method to
Hi :)
The XlsX, and other OOXML formats are notoriously unreliable. Each
different version of MS Office uses slightly different versions. There are
at least 3 different transitional versions of the format and they are not
always compatible with each other.
If you take the XlsX that was saved by
Discussion about open formats aside, I've looked at the file and it looks
like when saving as xlsx each sheet grow huge (some goes to ~20MB before
compression).
Could you also post the xlsx file obtained when saving with MSO, for
comparison? My guess is that either LO saves *a lot* of empty/dummy
Hi:
I've experienced the following issue:
The file attached is an .ODS file (1,976 KB). When seved as .XLSX file it
expands to more than 15 MB.
If the new .XLSX files is oppened with MSOffice 2013 it will ask for
recovery of information within the file, after that if we save the
recovered
