sage -
>From: Brian Barker
>To: users@global.libreoffice.org
>Sent: Saturday, 24 November 2012, 4:13
>Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] [More questions - but some the same as before]
>
>At 12:51 24/11/2012 +0900, Dr. R. O Stapf wrote:
>> On 2012-11-24 12:24, Brian Barker
Brian, please don't worry. I wrote from Brian and Charles. Ok?
On 2012-11-24 13:13, Brian Barker wrote:
At 12:51 24/11/2012 +0900, Dr. R. O Stapf wrote:
On 2012-11-24 12:24, Brian Barker wrote:
I have no idea how many users are subscribed this list but let's just say arguendo there are
10. If
At 12:51 24/11/2012 +0900, Dr. R. O Stapf wrote:
On 2012-11-24 12:24, Brian Barker wrote:
I have no idea how many users are subscribed this list but let's
just say arguendo there are 10. If each of us 10 users contributed
just 5 tasks they performed regularly in LW (and how those tasks
are acc
Below texts are from Brian and Charles.
I cannot say if 10 people can write about 5 tasks or not. I am willing to write about 3, 5 if I can
spare a bit more time. However, it must be organized. We all have other things to do thus
duplication must be avoided. This in turn means a working mode ne
At 14:27 23/11/2012 -0500, Charles Meyer wrote:
We could have them listed alphabetically so if
you're searching for a particular task you can
search it by task name - e.g. from Auto-correct to Word Count.
Or we could have the alphabetical list built into
the software itself. Oh, look: someon
