Bruce Carlson wrote:
>
> Sending an .xls version and asking the person on the other end to keep
> the document in that format is a valid point and can be substantiated
> by the fact that even different versions of MSO have trouble reading
> each other's version of .xlsx formats. Try swapping a
Bruce Carlson wrote:
>
> Sending an .xls version and asking the person on the other end to keep the
> document in that format is a valid point and can be substantiated by the
> fact that even different versions of MSO have trouble reading each other's
> version of .xlsx formats. Try swapping an .
Il 08/09/2011 14:35, webmaster for Kracked Press Productions ha scritto:
On 09/08/2011 01:22 AM, At0mic wrote:
e-letter wrote:
Solution #1:
Send back an xls version of that file and ask them to exchange
spreadsheets in that format.
Better still, send in ods and ask the recipient to use LO. If
e-letter wrote:
Solution #1:
Send back an xls version of that file and ask them to exchange
spreadsheets in that format.
Better still, send in ods and ask the recipient to use LO. If the
suggestion is declined, buy m$o. When minor incompatibility is
discovered between m$ hardware and software,
On 09/08/2011 02:38 AM, Bruce Carlson wrote:
e-letter wrote:
Solution #1:
Send back an xls version of that file and ask them to exchange
spreadsheets in that format.
Better still, send in ods and ask the recipient to use LO. If the
suggestion is declined, buy m$o. When minor incompatibility is
On 09/08/2011 01:22 AM, At0mic wrote:
e-letter wrote:
Solution #1:
Send back an xls version of that file and ask them to exchange
spreadsheets in that format.
Better still, send in ods and ask the recipient to use LO. If the
suggestion is declined, buy m$o. When minor incompatibility is
discov
Am 08.09.2011 00:07, e-letter wrote:
Would be interested to hear your explanation why other m$ formats are
_not_ against the interests of LO (i.e. increased _visible_ usage of
odt. Using LO to write m$ formats should be considered invisible
usage, of what benefit exactly?).
If not for collabo
e-letter wrote:
>
>> Solution #1:
>> Send back an xls version of that file and ask them to exchange
>> spreadsheets in that format.
>>
>
> Better still, send in ods and ask the recipient to use LO. If the
> suggestion is declined, buy m$o. When minor incompatibility is
> discovered between m$
e-letter wrote:
>
>> Solution #1:
>> Send back an xls version of that file and ask them to exchange
>> spreadsheets in that format.
>>
>
> Better still, send in ods and ask the recipient to use LO. If the
> suggestion is declined, buy m$o. When minor incompatibility is
> discovered between m$ ha
On 07/09/2011, Andreas Säger wrote:
> Am 07.09.2011 09:56, Roelof Oomen wrote:
...
>>
>> Should I file a bug? Or is someone interested in the file in order to
>> improve the xlsx saving abilities of Calc?
>>
To reiterate, the priority for calc is improvement in native file
format behaviour. If yo
+1 to freedom!
-
from twohot@device.mobile :)
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Säger
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:05:54
To:
Reply-To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: Calc corrupted an Excel xlsx file, should I
Am 07.09.2011 09:56, Roelof Oomen wrote:
I got a corrupted Excel xlsx file when I opened and subsequently saved it using
LibreOffice Calc. When I open it in Excel the message is "Excel found unreadable
content [...]", but opening it again in Calc does not produce any errors.
Should I file a bu
12 matches
Mail list logo
