[libreoffice-users] Re: LO Conflicts with OOo

2011-11-05 Thread NoOp
On 11/03/2011 10:00 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote: NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote in message ... Harold, check your attributes. I didn't with *any* of what you just quoted. No, you didn't. That was a mistake. Apologies. ... No worries Harold... I was having a bad 'no hair' day. All the best. Gary

[libreoffice-users] Re: LO Conflicts with OOo

2011-11-03 Thread Harold Fuchs
NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote in message news:j8q5dk$scb$1...@dough.gmane.org... Sorry for the delay, been out of action for a few days. On 10/31/2011 02:31 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote: NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote in message news:j8i8on$g8u$1...@dough.gmane.org... snip You can run the

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO Conflicts with OOo

2011-11-02 Thread Tom Davies
: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO Conflicts with OOo To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Wednesday, 2 November, 2011, 1:12 On 10/31/2011 02:31 AM, Harold Fuchs wrote: NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote in message news:j8i8on$g8u$1...@dough.gmane.org... snip You can run the programs

[libreoffice-users] Re: LO Conflicts with OOo

2011-11-02 Thread NoOp
On 11/02/2011 09:16 AM, Tom Davies wrote: Hi :) It looks pretty clear to me. What looks pretty clear to you? Anyway you can never really trust how the thread might have been manipulated along the way so judging people based on a reply of a reply of a reply would be pretty dumb. The

[libreoffice-users] Re: LO Conflicts with OOo

2011-10-31 Thread Harold Fuchs
NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote in message news:j8i8on$g8u$1...@dough.gmane.org... snip You can run the programs the same time, if each instance uses a different folder for the user settings. Also the other way round is possible, running one application with different users settings at the

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO Conflicts with OOo

2011-10-31 Thread Stephan Zietsman
Harold Fuchs wrote: The conflict I reported was between a non-portable OOo installed to the C: drive on the machine and a portable LO installed on a USB key. I don't think they'd be using the same folder for user settings. As far as I know, the portable version uses the profile on the USB key

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO Conflicts with OOo

2011-10-31 Thread MiguelAngel
El 31/10/11 10:55, Stephan Zietsman escribió: Harold Fuchs wrote: The conflict I reported was between a non-portable OOo installed to the C: drive on the machine and a portable LO installed on a USB key. I don't think they'd be using the same folder for user settings. As far as I know, the

Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO Conflicts with OOo

2011-10-30 Thread Tom Davies
:) --- On Sun, 30/10/11, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote: From: NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: LO Conflicts with OOo To: users@global.libreoffice.org Date: Sunday, 30 October, 2011, 1:20 On 10/29/2011 02:17 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi, Tom Davies schrieb

[libreoffice-users] Re: LO Conflicts with OOo

2011-10-29 Thread NoOp
On 10/29/2011 02:17 PM, Regina Henschel wrote: Hi, Tom Davies schrieb: Hi :) There is a guide to help avoid the usual conflicts http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel I think the problems are mostly when both version are open at the same time, for example if one is