Pedro wrote (14-01-12 00:22)
Done. Added to the wiki ;)
Thanks a lot :-)
I'm a little concerned that I can't find a similar page for 3.4.5 and it is
already available at download sites (even if it isn't announced or updated
on the LO web site).
There are 'only' bugfixes.
I guess
Cor Nouws wrote
Where no reference to the bugs fixed is left.
Maybe a pointer to a wiki page with those notes is relevant for that
www.page ?
I really don't understand TDF's goals or methods
Those Release Notes don't say anything about the changes since the previous
version... You can
El 15/01/12 0:06, Pedro escribió:
Cor Nouws wrote
Where no reference to the bugs fixed is left.
Maybe a pointer to a wiki page with those notes is relevant for that
www.page ?
I really don't understand TDF's goals or methods
Those Release Notes don't say anything about the changes since
Pedro wrote (11-01-12 15:00)
The Release Notes page fails to mention that LO 3.5 now supports Java 7
(1.7). In fact if you have both Java 6 and 7 you can select which one to use
in Tools, Options, LibreOffice, Java
Correct.
Release notes and marketing stuff, web pages etc. are work in
Cor Nouws wrote
Release notes and marketing stuff, web pages etc. are work in progress
all hands welcome :-)
Done. Added to the wiki ;)
I'm a little concerned that I can't find a similar page for 3.4.5 and it is
already available at download sites (even if it isn't announced or updated
:
From: Stephan Zietsman szi...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: re: So what's with LibO 3.5?
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Thursday, 12 January, 2012, 7:37
Onyeibo Oku wrote:
Hmm, the callout leaders for comments didn't get reviewed. Sometimes comments
on a phrase
Gérard Fargeot wrote
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/3.5
The Release Notes page fails to mention that LO 3.5 now supports Java 7
(1.7). In fact if you have both Java 6 and 7 you can select which one to use
in Tools, Options, LibreOffice, Java
--
View this message in
to be many flaws and vulnerabilites found in any
version of java no matter how new it is but at least the newer version might
have LESS holes!
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Wed, 11/1/12, Pedro pedl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Pedro pedl...@gmail.com
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: re: So what's
!
:)
-
from twohot@device.mobile :)
-Original Message-
From: Pedro pedl...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 06:00:32
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Reply-To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: [libreoffice-users] Re: re: So what's with LibO 3.5?
Gérard
Documentation
Team. Documentation might not seem glamorous or sexy but it makes a big
difference.
Regards from
Tom :)
--- On Wed, 11/1/12, Onyeibo Oku twoho...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Onyeibo Oku twoho...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: re: So what's with LibO 3.5?
To: Libre, Users users
:
From: Onyeibo Okutwoho...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: re: So what's with LibO 3.5?
To: Libre, Usersusers@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Wednesday, 11 January, 2012, 18:06
There!
3.5 is the way forward. I'm running it and I'm enjoying the experience :)
I just wish there's a better
--- On Wed, 11/1/12, Onyeibo Oku twoho...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Onyeibo Oku twoho...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: re: So what's with LibO 3.5?
To: Libre, Users users@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Wednesday, 11 January, 2012, 18:06
There!
3.5 is the way forward. I'm
12 matches
Mail list logo
