good points.
I was neither pro- nor con- -
merely saw this and thought the list might be interested, or not,
in another PR opportunity, or not, ;-)
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster
webmas...@krackedpress.com wrote:
I do not
from
Tom :)
From: Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 18 March 2013, 5:57
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] re. paperless groups ...
I do not understand the reference?
Are you saying that TDF/LO
To: Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com;
users@global.libreoffice.org users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 18 March 2013, 15:03
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] re. paperless groups ...
Hi :)
From looking at files generated by other people i think it's easier to
generate
: Kracked_P_P---webmaster webmas...@krackedpress.com
To: users@global.libreoffice.org
Sent: Monday, 18 March 2013, 5:57
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] re. paperless groups ...
I do not understand the reference?
Are you saying that TDF/LO should promote the green issues of reducing
... just wondering if LO might be more promotable if they joined
with this paperless idea ;-)
**
The Nitro Blog: We’re tossing paper this year—join
us!http://blog.nitropdf.com
--
We’re tossing paper this year—join
I do not understand the reference?
Are you saying that TDF/LO should promote the green issues of reducing
the consumption of paper in offices?
Are you saying that LO will help reduce the amount of paper since the
files can be directly exported as PDF files and other electronic formats
so
