Ken Springer wrote:
On 2/10/16 3:19 PM, libreoffice-ml.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote:
Ken Springer wrote:
Slippage in the rollers is what I was thinking of.
In my case, the error is consistent, so slippage is not problem.
Telling the printer where to actually start the printing appears to be
Perhaps the BASIC code was only displaying the number to a few decimal
places. In C, printf defaults to 6 decimal places, which isn't enough to
show the actual result as any different from the ideal result.
It's also possible that the spreadsheet was doing something more
complicated internally
On 12/02/16 1:21 AM, James Knott wrote:
On 02/11/2016 03:33 AM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
And there is the distinction between precision and accuracy. You can
be very precisely inaccurate.
I guess you've never studied Calculus, where the answer often
approaches, but never actually reaches some val
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 07:21:31AM -0500, James Knott wrote:
> On 02/11/2016 03:33 AM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
> > And there is the distinction between precision and accuracy. You can
> > be very precisely inaccurate.
>
> I guess you've never studied Calculus, where the answer often
> approaches, but
On 02/11/2016 03:33 AM, Steve Edmonds wrote:
> And there is the distinction between precision and accuracy. You can
> be very precisely inaccurate.
I guess you've never studied Calculus, where the answer often
approaches, but never actually reaches some value. You can get closer
and closer, but n
And there is the distinction between precision and accuracy. You can be
very precisely inaccurate.
Steve
On 2016-02-11 12:14, Virgil Arrington wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. Oddly enough, it makes some sense, even to
my non-techy brain. What I found interesting was that, in the
spreadsheet
On 10/02/16 10:53 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 2/10/16 4:27 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 10/02/16 12:01 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 2/10/16 8:28 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 09/02/16 11:39 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 2/9/16 2:23 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 09/02/16 03:23 PM, Dave Liesse wrote:
PDF is a
On 10/02/16 12:01 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 2/10/16 8:28 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 09/02/16 11:39 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 2/9/16 2:23 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 09/02/16 03:23 PM, Dave Liesse wrote:
I've never had any luck with any of the Avery templates I've tried
(although my problem has bee
Thanks for the explanation. Oddly enough, it makes some sense, even to
my non-techy brain. What I found interesting was that, in the
spreadsheet, I got the "wrong" 3., but I wrote a simple BASIC
program on my beloved Tandy Model 100 and got the "correct" answer of 4.
I was excited to see th
Virgil Arrington wrote:
Ken Springer wrote
I remember years ago when Intel turned out a chip that had an error in
it's math calculations. It was a rare happening, but when they
finally admitted it publicly, trying to say it wasn't important do to
the rare occurrence, it did not go over well at
Ken Springer wrote:
On 2/10/16 8:28 AM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 09/02/16 11:39 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 2/9/16 2:23 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 09/02/16 03:23 PM, Dave Liesse wrote:
I've never had any luck with any of the Avery templates I've tried
(although my problem has been mostly with left-to-
Ken Springer wrote
I remember years ago when Intel turned out a chip that had an error in
it's math calculations. It was a rare happening, but when they
finally admitted it publicly, trying to say it wasn't important do to
the rare occurrence, it did not go over well at all!
About 25 yea
On 09/02/16 11:39 PM, Ken Springer wrote:
On 2/9/16 2:23 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
On 09/02/16 03:23 PM, Dave Liesse wrote:
I've never had any luck with any of the Avery templates I've tried
(although my problem has been mostly with left-to-right adjustments
rather than top-to-bottom). I finally ju
On 09/02/16 03:23 PM, Dave Liesse wrote:
I've never had any luck with any of the Avery templates I've tried
(although my problem has been mostly with left-to-right adjustments
rather than top-to-bottom). I finally just got in the habit of
setting my paragraph position as 1/8" into the label; f
I've never had any luck with any of the Avery templates I've tried
(although my problem has been mostly with left-to-right adjustments
rather than top-to-bottom). I finally just got in the habit of setting
my paragraph position as 1/8" into the label; fooling with the template
specs didn't do
I have found that, at least with 8160 labels, LO works whereas AOO does
not. I realize that's not your issue, but at least *one* of the label
forms seems to work better than with LO than with AOO giving me the
impression that the LO developers have been a little more proactive in
chasing down l
16 matches
Mail list logo
