[gridengine users] Limit CPU usage - clover-mp

Hi all, one of my "users" is using clover-mp. This process take up to 8 cpu cores. But just one sge slot. I would like to know if there is a configuration/tip or something else to tell sge to limit cpu usage of this process. Thanks for your help. _

Re: [gridengine users] Limit CPU usage - clover-mp

Hi, Am 07.03.2011 um 09:38 schrieb Mauro Donadello: > one of my "users" is using clover-mp. > This process take up to 8 cpu cores. But just one sge slot. > I would like to know if there is a configuration/tip or something else to > tell sge to limit cpu usage of this process. although it's j

Re: [gridengine users] (no subject)

Hi, Am 07.03.2011 um 08:31 schrieb Bharanidharan Narayanaswamy: > Thank you for the reply. > > The UI is needed - because the application which is computing pops up a > terminal or console once the job is submitted. > > I tried suppressing the output and also tried to redirect it to NULL, both

[gridengine users] Where to enter issues?

Since December I got 6 new ones - where to enter them? At Github as it will be filled at one point with the former Issuezilla entries? At Son of GridEngine? -- Reuti ___ users mailing list users@gridengine.org https://gridengine.org/mailman/listinfo/use

Re: [gridengine users] Cannot connect to X server

Hi Richard and Reuti, Thanks a ton for your valuable inputs. I used the Xvfb to redirect the X output to the Virtual framebuffer and it is working fine.  Cheers, Thanks a lot again. --- On Mon, 7/3/11, Reuti wrote: From: Reuti Subject: Re: [gridengine users] (no subject) To: "Bharanidharan N

[gridengine users] Core Binding on Magny-Cours

Hi List, is anyone using the core binding feature on AMD Magny-Cours? If so, how do you do it? For me, loadcheck mis-reads the topology as (SCTTCTTCTTCTTCTTCTT)*4 rather than (S)*4. As far as I can tell, there are two problems: - the kernel (2.6.18-194.26.1.el5) only exposes core_id

Re: [gridengine users] Where to enter issues?

My suggestion is enter them in Github. The Grid Engine team is actively working on that codebase (you can see that from the commits). Internally we are using JIRA and maybe we can use that as well for submitting issues on the github repository. GitHub has issue tracking but it is very minimal

Re: [gridengine users] Core Binding on Magny-Cours

Am 07.03.2011 um 14:42 schrieb Esztermann, Ansgar: > Hi List, > > is anyone using the core binding feature on AMD Magny-Cours? If so, how do > you do it? For me, loadcheck mis-reads the topology as > (SCTTCTTCTTCTTCTTCTT)*4 rather than (S)*4. As far as I can tell, > there are two p

[gridengine users] pausing or holding a job and computing the next job

Hi, There is a single queue available to the users. Now a user has submitted a job which is going to take a long time to compute. Another users who has a job in queue is much simpler and will complete in few minutes. what would be the best / effective method to send the second job in place of th

Re: [gridengine users] Core Binding on Magny-Cours

On Mar 7, 2011, at 15:09 , Reuti wrote: > Am 07.03.2011 um 14:42 schrieb Esztermann, Ansgar: > >> Hi List, >> >> is anyone using the core binding feature on AMD Magny-Cours? If so, how do >> you do it? For me, loadcheck mis-reads the topology as >> (SCTTCTTCTTCTTCTTCTT)*4 rather than (SCC

[gridengine users] qlicserver integration

Hi All, I remember a question like this posted on the old mailing lists, but I'm having problems setting up qlicserver. Essentially, I have one FLEXlm server serving licences for two applications (with separate vendor daemons). When I run ./qlicserver -n, I'm getting double the number of lice

Re: [gridengine users] Core Binding on Magny-Cours

Am 07.03.2011 um 15:26 schrieb Esztermann, Ansgar: > On Mar 7, 2011, at 15:09 , Reuti wrote: > >> Am 07.03.2011 um 14:42 schrieb Esztermann, Ansgar: >> >>> Hi List, >>> >>> is anyone using the core binding feature on AMD Magny-Cours? If so, how do >>> you do it? For me, loadcheck mis-reads the

[gridengine users] Core Binding on Magny-Cours

On Mar 7, 2011, at 15:44 , Reuti wrote: > It's the physical ID which is changing for each socket. Magny-Cours just > output doubles for "physical id" and "core id" entries. But the "apicid" and > "initial apicid" are changing. But I don't know what's happening for Intel > CPUs for these entries

Re: [gridengine users] qlicserver integration

On 03/07/2011 03:33 PM, Chris Jewell wrote: > Hi All, > > I remember a question like this posted on the old mailing lists, but I'm > having problems setting up qlicserver. Essentially, I have one FLEXlm server > serving licences for two applications (with separate vendor daemons). When I > ru

Re: [gridengine users] pausing or holding a job and computing the next job

Hi, Am 07.03.2011 um 15:15 schrieb Bharanidharan Narayanaswamy: > There is a single queue available to the users. Now a user has submitted a > job which is going to take a long time to compute. Another users who has a > job in queue is much simpler and will complete in few minutes. > > what wo

Re: [gridengine users] pausing or holding a job and computing the next job

Hi Reuti, Thank you so much for that elaborate explanation as always :) This method works brilliant Thanks a ton, Cheers. --- On Mon, 7/3/11, Reuti wrote: From: Reuti Subject: Re: [gridengine users] pausing or holding a job and computing the next job To: "Bharanidharan Narayanaswamy" Cc: