>> Am 16.11.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Winkler, Ursula (ursula.wink...@uni-graz.at)
>> :
>>
Am 16.11.2015 um 11:41 schrieb Winkler, Ursula
(ursula.wink...@uni-graz.at) :
Dear gridengine members,
when there are two queues and one is a subordinate of the other,
the
Our cluster is 6.2u5 and uses local BDB spooling. We recently suffered a
qmaster crash and after reboot we noticed some strange behavior with the
jobseqnum. When we restarted the qmaster, the JOBIDs skipped up to the high
9's (996 range).
>From the SGE source, it appears the qmaster tri
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Reuti wrote:
Am 13.11.2015 um 05:56 schrieb Carl G. Riches :
On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Reuti wrote:
Am 10.11.2015 um 17:33 schrieb Carl G. Riches :
On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Reuti wrote:
Am 09.11.2015 um 19:02 schrieb Carl G. Riches :
On Sat, 7 Nov 2015, Reuti wrote:
Hi
> Am 16.11.2015 um 14:14 schrieb Winkler, Ursula (ursula.wink...@uni-graz.at)
> :
>
>>> Am 16.11.2015 um 11:41 schrieb Winkler, Ursula (ursula.wink...@uni-graz.at)
>>> :
>>>
>>> Dear gridengine members,
>>>
>>> when there are two queues and one is a subordinate of the other, then
>>> the rel
Hallo to distinguished forum members,
We've detected a strange metric for attribute "mem" that 'qacct' shows for one
of the jobs completed in the Grid:
[root@server ~]# qacct -j
==
qnameall.q
.
.
.
cpu 1191.944s
mem
>> Am 16.11.2015 um 11:41 schrieb Winkler, Ursula (ursula.wink...@uni-graz.at)
>> :
>>
>> Dear gridengine members,
>>
>> when there are two queues and one is a subordinate of the other, then
>> the release/shift of slots to the superordinate jobs is no problem,
>> but (other) consumeable resou
> Am 16.11.2015 um 11:41 schrieb Winkler, Ursula (ursula.wink...@uni-graz.at)
> :
>
> Dear gridengine members,
>
> when there are two queues and one is a subordinate of the other, then the
> release/shift
> of slots to the superordinate jobs is no problem, but (other) consumeable
> resources
> Am 13.11.2015 um 05:56 schrieb Carl G. Riches :
>
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2015, Reuti wrote:
>
>>
>>> Am 10.11.2015 um 17:33 schrieb Carl G. Riches :
>>>
>>> On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Reuti wrote:
>>>
> Am 09.11.2015 um 19:02 schrieb Carl G. Riches :
>
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2015, Reuti wro
Dear gridengine members,
when there are two queues and one is a subordinate of the other, then the
release/shift
of slots to the superordinate jobs is no problem, but (other) consumeable
resources
like h_vmem are. Does somebody have an idea to bypass that?
Thanks,
Ursula
___