Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd 2.2.3 as an SSL proxy with a client certificate fails on connect

2006-12-20 Thread Shai Yallin
*snip* Anyone? Shai Yallin IT Manager & Developer LocatioNet Systems Ltd. Tel: +972-9-8856451 Fax: +972-9-8856452 Mobile: +972-54-4840868 "...we will be restoring normality just as soon as we are sure what is normal anyway."

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 as proxy

2006-12-20 Thread Sriharsha M
Hi, I have set up Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 with mod_proxy as a forward proxy on RHEL 4.0 and I am planning to build a filter. In Apache 2.2.3, when I use 'mod_case_filter_in.c' from the experimental modules, I always get r->unparsed_uri, r->uri and r->filename as NULL. I get r->hostname an

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] public server

2006-12-20 Thread Daniel Marques
I'll try to make contact with my ISP provider. Maybe I don't have any power over his router. Thanks for all the help. 2006/12/20, Maxim Veksler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 12/20/06, Daniel Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you guys, but: > > > The http://localhost works fine when my serve

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite and HTTP headers. (Accept-Language)

2006-12-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/20/06, Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I am an absolute newbie when it comes to mod_rewrite and I am still going thru some documentation to see whether I can make it do what I need. While I am going thru the docs and examples, I figured to post a message on this list as well, j

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_rewrite and HTTP headers. (Accept-Language)

2006-12-20 Thread Richard de Vries
I am an absolute newbie when it comes to mod_rewrite and I am still going thru some documentation to see whether I can make it do what I need. While I am going thru the docs and examples, I figured to post a message on this list as well, just in case someone knows the answer right from the top of

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] public server

2006-12-20 Thread Maxim Veksler
On 12/20/06, Daniel Marques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thank you guys, but: The http://localhost works fine when my server is running. WinXP. And I don't know if I am behind a NAT router.But, it's possible that Try disabling the windows firewall on the specific interface, if that works make s

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Release date for Apache 2.0.60?

2006-12-20 Thread Richard de Vries
Thanks William. I am currently re-evaluating the version of Apache we're running and trying to plan around any "planned" updates. I would love to go to Apache 2.2.x, but some third party modules we're running are not yet compatible and I don't have access to their source-code. But anyway, thanks

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Release date for Apache 2.0.60?

2006-12-20 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Richard de Vries wrote: > I was just curious if anyone knew when we can expect > Apache 2.0.60. Is this right around the corner, or > still several months out? There are no plans whatsoever. I wouldn't worry yourself about it when 2.2.3 is current, 2.2.4 is around the corner and only 2.2.x and th

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?

2006-12-20 Thread Richard de Vries
Hmmm ... perhaps this module got compiled with a compiler not compatible with the compiler used to compile apache. I personally would still try to get a hold of the source-code, and compile this module with apxs. R --- thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > []# yum info mod_dav_svn > -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?

2006-12-20 Thread thomas Armstrong
[]# yum info mod_dav_svn Name : mod_dav_svn Arch : i386 Version: 1.4.2 Release: 2.fc6 Size : 135 k Repo : installed - On 12/20/06, thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: where can I find the mod_dav_svn.so for FC6? On 12/20/06, Richard de Vries <[EMAIL

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?

2006-12-20 Thread Richard de Vries
I am not familiar with this module so I don't know how it is being distributed ... but can't you just locate the source and compile it yourself? --- thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > where can I find the mod_dav_svn.so for FC6? > __ D

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?

2006-12-20 Thread thomas Armstrong
where can I find the mod_dav_svn.so for FC6? On 12/20/06, Richard de Vries <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Or perhaps this .so got pulled from a different OS? It's been a while, but I think I got a similiar error when I accidentely tried using a .so compiled for linux on a solaris box. (Don't ask how

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2 as Loadbalancer

2006-12-20 Thread Mueller, Oliver
Hi, I am using Apache 2.2 as loadbalancer for a JBOSS-J2EE-Cluster. The incoming calls are redirected by ajp. This is the configuration I added to the httpd.conf ProxyPass /FOnetConsole ! ProxyPass / balancer://FOnetCluster/ BalancerMember ajp://wnasw022:8009 BalancerMember ajp://kpmg1:8

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caching Authenticated content with mod_cache

2006-12-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/20/06, Roland Rabben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My goal was to use the "Cache-Control: public, no-cache" header. From what I understand that should make a cache-server cache the response, but still require authentication from the origin server before the cache releases its local representa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?

2006-12-20 Thread Richard de Vries
Or perhaps this .so got pulled from a different OS? It's been a while, but I think I got a similiar error when I accidentely tried using a .so compiled for linux on a solaris box. (Don't ask how this happened ... long story!) --- Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where did mod_dav_svn.so

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caching Authenticated content with mod_cache

2006-12-20 Thread Roland Rabben
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive > Sent: 20. desember 2006 15:58 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caching Authenticated content with mod_cache > > On 12/20/06, Roland Rabben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Release date for Apache 2.0.60?

2006-12-20 Thread Richard de Vries
I was just curious if anyone knew when we can expect Apache 2.0.60. Is this right around the corner, or still several months out? __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ap_proxy: could not create the lock

2006-12-20 Thread prash reddy
Hi All, I am using Apache version 2.0.55 on LINUX. when ever Apache restarts with * graceful* option, the following errors are logging.what would be the problem for this behaviour? [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [notice] Graceful restart requested, doing restart [Wed Nov 15 13:33:34 2006] [warn] (22

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?

2006-12-20 Thread thomas Armstrong
Mmm.. I don't know, Joshua. I installed it by using Yum: []# yum install mod_dav_svn I suppose I could get the right version if I build it from sources, right? Thank you very much, --Thomas On 12/20/06, Joshua Slive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/20/06, thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?

2006-12-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/20/06, thomas Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi. Using Apache 2.0.59 on Linux FC6, I want to install 'mod_dav_svn'. I've got: /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_dav_svn.so So I inserted within 'httpd.conf': LoadModule dav_svn_module /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_dav_svn.so --

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_dav_svn.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?

2006-12-20 Thread thomas Armstrong
Hi. Using Apache 2.0.59 on Linux FC6, I want to install 'mod_dav_svn'. I've got: /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_dav_svn.so So I inserted within 'httpd.conf': LoadModule dav_svn_module /usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_dav_svn.so But I get this error message when restarting Apache: -

[EMAIL PROTECTED] How to store an uploaded file on hard disk

2006-12-20 Thread export
Is there any command that causes Apache will be saving a file ( being uploaded via http POST), NOT to memory BUT on hardisk? Thank you La. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BerkeleyDB RewriteMap on NFS - problems?

2006-12-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/19/06, Julian Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) Is it bad to put BDB RewriteMaps on an NFS server? Is anyone else doing it without problems? 2) Is it true that some versions of BerkeleyDB don't have "read-only" semantics, and could this be causing the problem? 3) Is the problem here relat

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Caching Authenticated content with mod_cache

2006-12-20 Thread Joshua Slive
On 12/20/06, Roland Rabben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I have set up Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 with mod_proxy, mod_proxy_ajp and mod_cache as a reverse proxy in front of a Tomcat 5.5 server. The solution works fine except that I am having trouble getting Apache to cache content from a directory

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Caching Authenticated content with mod_cache

2006-12-20 Thread Roland Rabben
Hi I have set up Apache HTTP Server 2.2.3 with mod_proxy, mod_proxy_ajp and mod_cache as a reverse proxy in front of a Tomcat 5.5 server. The solution works fine except that I am having trouble getting Apache to cache content from a directory that is protected using Basic Authentication. Both serv

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.3 + Active Directory

2006-12-20 Thread Dan Nawrocki
> If the initial bind is working then it's probably your LDAP search > criteria which depends on how your AD is layed out. > > This is what I use (I use the AD global catalog (GC)): > > > AuthLDAPURL > "ldap://ad.nos.com:3268/OU=Accounts,DC=nos,DC=com?sAMAccountName?sub?(ob jectClass=*)" > > Yo

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache stops processing requests

2006-12-20 Thread Sai Jai Ganesh Gurubaran
Hi All, We have apache 2.0.59 as a forward proxy on RHEL 3.0 in Worker. The traffic on the server is around 45 Mb. Mod_status reported around 600 requests per second The worker conf is ServerLimit 18 StartServers10 ThreadsPerChild 50 MaxClients 900 MinSpareTh