[EMAIL PROTECTED] Give me Solutions

2007-06-07 Thread Ravi Prakash
Hi, I am compiling my program using following syntax : # gcc -I /usr/local/ssl/include -I /usr/local/mysql/include -I /usr/local/apache2/include -L /usr/local/ssl/lib -lcrypto -lssl -L /usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient -L /usr/local/apache2/lib -lapr-0 -laprutil-0 ts.c It is

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Launching one more unwanted daemon

2007-06-07 Thread Yvo van Doorn
On 6/5/07, Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/5/07, Arnab Ganguly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am replacing Apache with NES(Sun Web Server).NES is pretty old.So I wanted to use Apache with single process and multi threaded web server similar to NES. To be honest, that doesn't

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] TRACE and Apache 2.x

2007-06-07 Thread Yvo van Doorn
On 5/29/07, Jeroen Vriezen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Currently we are using Apache 2.0.46. On the 1.3.x version we always used the following mod_rewrite rule to disable the TRACE option: RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^TRACE RewriteRule .* - [F] When using these rules

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WAMP stack

2007-06-07 Thread Yvo van Doorn
On 5/31/07, Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nat, On May 31, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Nat Colley wrote: That should really do the trick. However, you mentioned before that your client arrives at the wrong virtual host, so we'll need to find out what exactly happens and why. # Use name-based

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't view SSL-enabled pages using Firefox

2007-06-07 Thread Boyle Owen
-Original Message- From: Salcedo, Simon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:37 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Can't view SSL-enabled pages using Firefox Hi, I recently installed SSL certificates on our Apache 2.0 server.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Give me Solutions

2007-06-07 Thread Eric Covener
On 6/7/07, Ravi Prakash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # gcc -I /usr/local/ssl/include -I /usr/local/mysql/include -I /usr/local/apache2/include -L /usr/local/ssl/lib -lcrypto -lssl -L /usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient -L /usr/local/apache2/lib -lapr-0 -laprutil-0 ts.c

[EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd attempts to open file.html/.htaccess (is this a bug?)

2007-06-07 Thread Allen Pulsifer
Summary: When processing a GET /.../file.html, Apache httpd briefly treats file.html as a directory and attempts to open docroot/.../file.html/.htaccess. The os returns ENOTDIR, and then processing of the request continues. There would seem to be no reason for httpd to attempt to open

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache using AD autentication

2007-06-07 Thread Eric DuToit
I don't know if you can add multiple LDAP (AD) entries to the Directory container. I've (intentionally) moved well away from Windows support and don't have any way to test it or I'd give it a go. Eric -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd attempts to open file.html/.htaccess (is this a bug?)

2007-06-07 Thread Nick Kew
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 11:59:59 -0400 Allen Pulsifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Summary: When processing a GET /.../file.html, Apache httpd briefly treats file.html as a directory and attempts to open docroot/.../file.html/.htaccess. The os returns ENOTDIR, and then processing of the request

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] httpd attempts to open file.html/.htaccess (is this a bug?)

2007-06-07 Thread Allen Pulsifer
Let me guess. You're using the version of ReiserFS that changed the semantics of stat()? Hello Nick, Its running whatever comes stock with a default installation of CentOS-5, which is definitely not Reiser. If you think this is somehow relevant or important, I'll try to figure out what it

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to addres

2007-06-07 Thread Malladi, Sasikanth
All, I'm running Apache 2.0.59 on Solaris 10. When I try to start up Apache, I see the error: - (125)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address [::]:443 no listening sockets available, shutting down Unable to open logs

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to addres

2007-06-07 Thread Malladi, Sasikanth
I figured it out. It's trying to use 443 as I didn't modify ssl.con (and I'm using https). I've made that change but when I try to run it again now it's complaining about port 80 not being available. Any help? Regards, Sashi Malladi CATE Network Eng 908-563-1249 -Original Message-

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to addres

2007-06-07 Thread Vincent Bray
On 07/06/07, Malladi, Sasikanth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I figured it out. It's trying to use 443 as I didn't modify ssl.con (and I'm using https). I've made that change but when I try to run it again now it's complaining about port 80 not being available. Try here:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] VHOST and SSL

2007-06-07 Thread Sebastien Roy
Hi folks, We are running Apache/2.2.3 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8b DAV/2 PHP/5.1.4 and everything is working perfectly except one thing and I'm sure it's a configuration problem. We have some domains that have SSL certificate and some not. My problem is very simple, what i'm doing

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VHOST and SSL

2007-06-07 Thread Joshua Slive
On 6/7/07, Sebastien Roy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, We are running Apache/2.2.3 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.2.3 OpenSSL/0.9.8b DAV/2 PHP/5.1.4 and everything is working perfectly except one thing and I'm sure it's a configuration problem. We have some domains that have SSL certificate and some

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VHOST and SSL

2007-06-07 Thread Allen Pulsifer
Hello Sebastien, Short answer: the host running HTTPS must have a dedicated IP address. Long answer: when a client connects to the server at port 443, the first thing they will do is an SSL handshake. This happens even before the client sends its HTTPS request with the url and Host header.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache, Windows XP, and mapped drives

2007-06-07 Thread Jim Owens
I just set up Apache 2.2.4 on a Windows XP system (from the current .msi), and I thought I'd share my findings about using mapped network drives. On my old W2K system, I could succesfully Alias to my mapped drives by logging in the Apache service using my account, or a special apache account

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] VHOST and SSL

2007-06-07 Thread Sebastien Roy
Hi Allen What currently happens is the certificate error and it's point to the first vhost using SSL and what I want to happen is no answer at all from port 443 on that vhost. So I think I will configure an another IP just for SSL! Thanks! Allen Pulsifer wrote: Hello Sebastien, Short

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache, Windows XP, and mapped drives

2007-06-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jim Owens wrote: I just set up Apache 2.2.4 on a Windows XP system (from the current .msi), and I thought I’d share my findings about using mapped network drives. If anyone else is trying to deal with this, one workaround is to turn the Apache service off and run httpd.exe in a

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache, Windows XP, and mapped drives

2007-06-07 Thread Dragon
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Jim Owens wrote: I just set up Apache 2.2.4 on a Windows XP system (from the current .msi), and I thought I’d share my findings about using mapped network drives. If anyone else is trying to deal with this, one workaround is to turn the Apache service off and

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache, Windows XP, and mapped drives

2007-06-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Dragon wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Jim Owens wrote: I just set up Apache 2.2.4 on a Windows XP system (from the current .msi), and I thought I’d share my findings about using mapped network drives. If anyone else is trying to deal with this, one workaround is to turn the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache, Windows XP, and mapped drives

2007-06-07 Thread Tony Stevenson
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Dragon wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Jim Owens wrote: I just set up Apache 2.2.4 on a Windows XP system (from the current .msi), and I thought I’d share my findings about using mapped network drives. If anyone else is trying to deal with

[EMAIL PROTECTED] need to alter FROM address when sending with PHP forms

2007-06-07 Thread Dylan Bouterse
My company has a RH ES4 web server running apache/2.2.2 and PHP 5.1.4. Our PHP programmer has developed quite a few PHP email forms and each time an email is sent, the FROM: address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't know if this is a PHP problem or apache problem (or even a sendmail problem for that

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache, Windows XP, and mapped drives

2007-06-07 Thread Jim Owens
Thanks all. I've been looking further into this, and according to Microsoft (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/180362/en-us), On Windows NT and on Windows 2000, drive letters are global to the system. All users on the system share the letters A-Z. Each user does not get their own set of drive

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] need to alter FROM address when sending with PHP forms

2007-06-07 Thread Vincent Bray
On 08/06/07, Dylan Bouterse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If this is definitely NOT an apache problem, please let me know and I will move on from there. Thank you. It isn't an apache problem (apache doesn't send mail unless you do highly specialised tricks with it). But anyway try this for giggles.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache, Windows XP, and mapped drives

2007-06-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jim Owens wrote: However, drive letters that are mapped from a service that is running under the local System account are visible to all logon sessions. WTH? That's nonsense since MS strongly recommends against EVERY granting the LocalSystem account any network privileges at all.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Howto include sqlite3 --with-dbd

2007-06-07 Thread Mark Constable
I'm struggling to find any info or examples on how to include sqlite3 support for mod_authn_dbd and httpd-2.2.4. This is my current configure line but it's not working. I suspect I need to build apr separately but it's not clear if I need to and/or how to. Can anyone suggest modifications to my