Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrong apache version shown from $_SERVER['SERVER_SOFTWARE'] on Fedora 7

2007-09-22 Thread Zen Kato
> > I installed F7 and then upgraded to > > .. to what? After fresh install F7 from CD, I did # yum update. Before the fresh installation of F7, I had upgraded this PC from FC5 to F7. This system showed Apache/2.2.0 in spite of httpd-2.2.2-1.3 on FC5. I expected to be corrected it by upgradin

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrong apache version shown from $_SERVER['SERVER_SOFTWARE'] on Fedora 7

2007-09-22 Thread Rikard Bosnjakovic
On 22/09/2007, Zen Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ps auxww|grep httpd > root 2090 0.0 4.3 103260 21852 ?Ss 13:59 0:00 > /usr/sbin/httpd > apache2200 0.0 0.7 24868 3908 ?S14:00 0:00 > /usr/sbin/httpd These are different. I bet tha

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrong apache version shown from $_SERVER['SERVER_SOFTWARE'] on Fedora 7

2007-09-22 Thread Vincent Bray
On 22/09/2007, Rikard Bosnjakovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 22/09/2007, Zen Kato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ps auxww|grep httpd > > root 2090 0.0 4.3 103260 21852 ?Ss 13:59 0:00 > > /usr/sbin/httpd > > apache2200 0.0 0.7 24868 3908 ?

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http and https

2007-09-22 Thread Sander Temme
On Sep 21, 2007, at 9:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry, I don't quit understand what your means... I'm sorry to hear that. For the Web Server setting ( http + https ) : Listen 80 NameVirtualHost ip_address NameVirtualHost ip_address:80 Because you're not running name-based virtual

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Binaries prepared for users@ win32 testing

2007-09-22 Thread Sander Temme
On Sep 19, 2007, at 9:43 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: validate the newest installers *especially on vista or 2008* you will Running apache_2.2.6-win32-x86-openssl-0.9.8e.msi on a 64 bit pre- release of Longhorn. Running as (AD Domain) Administrator. Installer is of course not signed, s

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Binaries prepared for users@ win32 testing

2007-09-22 Thread Octavian Rasnita
Does it work with mod_perl? I am trying to use Apache 2.2.4 but with no success, because if I do net stop apache2 net start apache2 ...for more times, aproximately 30% of the trials give an error: [Sat Sep 22 18:37:38 2007] [crit] master_main: create child process failed. Exiting. [Sat Sep 2

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache works in one interface but not the other

2007-09-22 Thread Hatem
Hi, This is quite a puzzle to me; I hope someone can help me out CentOS 4.5 on a good AMD 64 machine with two interface cards eth0 going to local network, and eth1 going out to the world My ISP blocks port 80! (no surprise) but not port 88 So, I've configured apache to run on port 88 listening

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrong apache version shown from $_SERVER['SERVER_SOFTWARE'] on Fedora 7

2007-09-22 Thread Rikard Bosnjakovic
On 22/09/2007, Vincent Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's perfectly normal behaviour for apache. I'm very well aware of that, but regarding OP's problem this is to be the most likely error source. The old apache running while upgrading the server and then starting a new one from the same pa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http and https

2007-09-22 Thread edwardspl
Sander Temme wrote: > > On Sep 21, 2007, at 9:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Sorry, I don't quit understand what your means... > > > I'm sorry to hear that. > >> For the Web Server setting ( http + https ) : >> >> Listen 80 >> >> NameVirtualHost ip_address > > > NameVirtualHost ip_address:80

[EMAIL PROTECTED] xampp

2007-09-22 Thread Lori D. Cole
Hello, I have installed XAMPP and Wordpress on my notebook and I can see my Wordpress blog from my browser on my local host. So, part of the mission is achieved as I would like to play around with my Wordpress files locally before uploading them to a remote host. Phew. 1. I am not und

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Binaries prepared for users@ win32 testing

2007-09-22 Thread Sander Temme
On Sep 22, 2007, at 12:30 PM, Octavian Rasnita wrote: Does it work with mod_perl? I have not tried mod_perl. So far, I have only tried the default path through the installer, not more and not less than I describe. S. -- Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http and https

2007-09-22 Thread Sander Temme
On Sep 22, 2007, at 5:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If so, would you mind to post your config as an sample here for reference ? You assume that I have a config to post. This is not the case. S. -- Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF