[EMAIL PROTECTED] ntlm authorization: strange behavior

2008-02-05 Thread robert rottermann
Hi there, we installed an SSO where we authorize the access to an intranet by help of NTLM. users can access the intranet IF they have opened a page in their browser before accessing the intranet. if they go directly to the ubtranet (maybe they have it as their default page) a login page is

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse proxy domain A to domain B

2008-02-05 Thread Paul Cocker
Is it possible to setup a reverse proxy which accepts connections for external facing domain A and then passes them to internal only domain B? Would that work? Paul Cocker TNT Post is the trading name for TNT Post UK Ltd (company number: 04417047), TNT Post (Doordrop Media) Ltd (00613278),

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mod_authnz_ldap AUTHENTICATE_* Env variables ?

2008-02-05 Thread jehan procaccia
Eric Covener wrote: On Jan 31, 2008 12:59 PM, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 31, 2008 12:16 PM, jehan procaccia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do enter in mod_auth_cas for authn, then authz is supposed to be carried out from mod_authnz_ldap, Peaking at the source, it

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse proxy domain A to domain B

2008-02-05 Thread Tony Stevenson
Paul Cocker wrote: Is it possible to setup a reverse proxy which accepts connections for external facing domain A and then passes them to internal only domain B? Would that work? Paul, Yes that would work fine, so long as your reverse proxy can resolve all the internal names. The internal

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse proxy domain A to domain B

2008-02-05 Thread Tony Stevenson
Tony Stevenson wrote: Paul, Yes that would work fine, so long as your reverse proxy can resolve all the internal names. The internal domain, does not need to, and probably should not, be resolvable externally. For example: VirtualHost *:80 ServerName www.example.com ProxyPass /

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compliance of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act

2008-02-05 Thread Octavian Rasnita
Apache doesn't have anything to do with the accessibility. It just provides the web pages which can be accessible or not accessible at all. More information about accessibility can be found on www.w3c.org. Octavian - Original Message - From: rheaney [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Compliance of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act

2008-02-05 Thread rheaney
Does anyone know if the Apache HTTP Server is 508 compliant? Also, do you know where I can find a Voluntary Product Accessibility Template (VPAT) for it? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Compliance-of-Section-508-of-the-Rehabilitation-Act-tp15290272p15290272.html Sent

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Compliance of Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act

2008-02-05 Thread Nick Kew
On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 05:47:26 -0800 (PST) rheaney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anyone know if the Apache HTTP Server is 508 compliant? 508 compliance applies to a site (or a page), not to a server. More rarely, it could also apply to the tools a sysop uses to administrate an apache server.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Viewvc, kerberos and Location directives, an ordering problem?

2008-02-05 Thread Todd, David
I am trying to use viewvc to let my users browse the code base in our svn repositories. We have a number of them. Some of them must have restricted access, but at the same time, want to be in a hierarchy with others that have a different access group. The authentication takes place using

[EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess RewriteRule Not Working.

2008-02-05 Thread Scott Wilcox
hey folks. Server: Apache/2.0.61 For some weird reason, this URL rewrite isn't working and I can't figure out why. Am I missing something completely? RewriteRule ^/confirm/([a-zA-Z0-9_\-]+)$ /page_confirm.php?hash=$1 smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess RewriteRule Not Working.

2008-02-05 Thread Joshua Slive
On Feb 5, 2008 12:08 PM, Scott Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hey folks. Server: Apache/2.0.61 For some weird reason, this URL rewrite isn't working and I can't figure out why. Am I missing something completely? RewriteRule ^/confirm/([a-zA-Z0-9_\-]+)$ /page_confirm.php?hash=$1

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess RewriteRule Not Working.

2008-02-05 Thread Joshua Slive
On Feb 5, 2008 2:04 PM, Scott Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joshua Slive wrote: On Feb 5, 2008 12:08 PM, Scott Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hey folks. Server: Apache/2.0.61 For some weird reason, this URL rewrite isn't working and I can't figure out why. Am I missing something

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess RewriteRule Not Working.

2008-02-05 Thread Scott Wilcox
Joshua Slive wrote: On Feb 5, 2008 2:04 PM, Scott Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Joshua Slive wrote: On Feb 5, 2008 12:08 PM, Scott Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hey folks. Server: Apache/2.0.61 For some weird reason, this URL rewrite isn't working and I can't figure out why. Am I

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .htaccess RewriteRule Not Working.

2008-02-05 Thread Scott Wilcox
Joshua Slive wrote: On Feb 5, 2008 12:08 PM, Scott Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hey folks. Server: Apache/2.0.61 For some weird reason, this URL rewrite isn't working and I can't figure out why. Am I missing something completely? RewriteRule ^/confirm/([a-zA-Z0-9_\-]+)$

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] modifying header in request

2008-02-05 Thread Cenk Oguz
Thanks for the advice Eric! I looked it up and found information and examples like the one below. However the X_REMOTE_USER header always comes out empty, I can not figure out why. I can see that REMOTE_USER indeed contains an authentic username. According to mod_rewrite documentation the

[EMAIL PROTECTED] BOTH ldap AND htpasswd/file authentication (apache httpd 2.2.6)

2008-02-05 Thread deckrider
Hello, I'm using apache httpd 2.2.6 on Solaris (for Subversion). My trouble is trying to supplement ldap authentication with a few htpasswd entries. I can get each working separately, but not together (it appears to occasionally work, but mostly causes hanging). Works: AuthType Basic AuthName