Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 1.3 on Vista Home issue

2009-06-01 Thread Darryle Steplight
Hi Evgeny, I just installed Apache 2.2 on Windows Vista last week. I'm just curious , how are you starting Apache? Are you using the net command from the command line or are do you have it running as a windows service? On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Evgeny Savitsky evgeny.savit...@gmail.com

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 1.3 on Vista Home issue

2009-06-01 Thread Evgeny Savitsky
Hi Darryle, Interesting thing is I had a positive experience with apache over vista on other PCs (may be other versions of Vista). Apache is installed as Windows service and is started via net command first time and automatically as service each time Windows is starting up. On Mon, Jun 1, 2009

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 1.3 on Vista Home issue

2009-06-01 Thread Darryle Steplight
Did you install http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=90548130-4468-4BBC-9673-D6ACABD5D13Bdisplaylang=en before installing Apache? You may need to download the (x86) version depending on whats running on your computer. Worst case scenario uninstall apache, download the right

[us...@httpd] Can not access port 2000

2009-06-01 Thread hateSpam
Dear All, Our server is Centos 5 and we are using Webmin. When I try to log-in in our server using https://ourServer.com:1 it works fine when I try to use https://ourServer.com:2 it keep processing it and never bring log-in page. It used to work fine last week. I will appreciate if any

RE: [us...@httpd] Can not access port 2000

2009-06-01 Thread chris c...@tch
Did you changed the login port from 2 to port 1? Check your config. -Original Message- From: hateSpam [mailto:khwaja_a...@yahoo.co.uk] Sent: Monday, 1 June 2009 9:17 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [us...@httpd] Can not access port 2000 Dear All, Our server is Centos 5

RE: [us...@httpd] Use of NoProxy without a DNS lookup

2009-06-01 Thread David Vaughan
Chris, Thanks for those suggestions. The LAN is only connected to the main network via a satellite link, which is slow and expensive. I am working on an intelligent DNS server that will only process requests when a user is logged on, but this won't be available for a few months yet. In

Re: [us...@httpd] Use of NoProxy without a DNS lookup

2009-06-01 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 01.06.09 12:17, David Vaughan wrote: Thanks for those suggestions. The LAN is only connected to the main network via a satellite link, which is slow and expensive. I am working on an intelligent DNS server that will only process requests when a user is logged on, but this won't be

[us...@httpd] php downloaded instead of running

2009-06-01 Thread admin2
Hi there, I am running apache2 on an ubuntu server and I must not have php installed. When I attempt to run a php program my browser, firefox for mac in this case, attempts to download it. I also placed the following line in my /etc/apache2/http.conf I hope that is the right place to put it.

[us...@httpd] Strange Apache error (appears to be related to bad pidfile)

2009-06-01 Thread Chris Brooks
Good morning, I've had a strange problem with Apache twice in the past week, and I'm out of ideas as to what might be going on. Here's the background: I run a website that uses a plain-vanilla Apache server to serve images, and uses mod_proxy to forward requests for everything else to a backend

[us...@httpd] How to retrieve contents from memcache using POST request parameter

2009-06-01 Thread Suan-Aik Yeo
Hi, I was wondering if there is a way to retrieve content from memcached using a POST request parameter as a key? As in, if the POST request had a x=1 parameter, I would look into memcached to see if there is something whose key is 1, if there is, I would get the corresponding value from

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache 1.3 on Vista Home issue

2009-06-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Darryle Steplight wrote: Hi Evgeny, I just installed Apache 2.2 on Windows Vista last week. I'm just curious , how are you starting Apache? Are you using the net command from the command line or are do you have it running as a windows service? There is no difference above, the net

Re: [us...@httpd] php downloaded instead of running

2009-06-01 Thread admin2
Frank Gingras wrote: Noah, Please read: http://wiki.apache.org/httpd/PHPDownload Frank thanks Frank - that was the answer - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See

[us...@httpd] Re: How to retrieve contents from memcache using POST request parameter

2009-06-01 Thread Dan Poirier
Suan-Aik Yeo yeosuan...@gmail.com writes: Right now I've installed the modmemcache module from http://code.google.com/p/modmemcachecache/ If you're using a module you didn't get from Apache, you should probably ask somebody at the place where you got it rather than an Apache list. -- Dan

[us...@httpd] Re: How to retrieve contents from memcache using POST request parameter

2009-06-01 Thread Suan-Aik Yeo
Dan Poirier poirier at pobox.com writes: Suan-Aik Yeo yeosuanaik at gmail.com writes: Right now I've installed the modmemcache module from http://code.google.com/p/modmemcachecache/ If you're using a module you didn't get from Apache, you should probably ask somebody at the place

[us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread John Oliver
Forbidden You don't have permission to access / on this server. Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. Web server is RHEL 5.2 running httpd-2.2.3-22.el5 Nothing is logged to any error_log. Access attempts are logged

Re: [us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread Frank Gingras
John, What does the error log say, exactly? Frank John Oliver wrote: Forbidden You don't have permission to access / on this server. Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. Web server is RHEL 5.2 running

Re: [us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread Sander Temme
On Jun 1, 2009, at 2:52 PM, John Oliver wrote: Forbidden You don't have permission to access / on this server. Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. Web server is RHEL 5.2 running httpd-2.2.3-22.el5 Nothing is

Re: [us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread John Oliver
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 06:00:22PM -0400, Frank Gingras wrote: John, What does the error log say, exactly? Absolutely nothing, besides the messages from httpd starting. John Oliver wrote: Forbidden You don't have permission to access / on this server. Additionally, a 403 Forbidden

Re: [us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread John Oliver
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 03:09:23PM -0700, Sander Temme wrote: Web server is RHEL 5.2 running httpd-2.2.3-22.el5 Nothing is logged to any error_log. I believe that is impossible: 403s are logged. Are you sure you are looking in the right log? What are the access controls on your

Re: [us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread John Oliver
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 03:09:23PM -0700, Sander Temme wrote: I believe that is impossible: 403s are logged. Are you sure you are looking in the right log? What are the access controls on your DocumentRoot? What is the LogLevel in your configuration file? I bumped LOgLevel to

Re: [us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread Frank Gingras
John, Then you are looking in the wrong error log, since a 403 is always logged. The other possibility is that you're hitting browser cache. Frank John Oliver wrote: On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 06:00:22PM -0400, Frank Gingras wrote: John, What does the error log say, exactly?

Re: [us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread Sander Temme
On Jun 1, 2009, at 3:27 PM, Frank Gingras wrote: John, Then you are looking in the wrong error log, since a 403 is always logged. The other possibility is that you're hitting browser cache. Yes, but John's other e-mail does show activity, which means he's actually serving pages.

Re: [us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread John Oliver
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 06:27:35PM -0400, Frank Gingras wrote: John, Then you are looking in the wrong error log, since a 403 is always logged. The other possibility is that you're hitting browser cache. There are no other log files. [r...@mda-vm1h ~]# date Mon Jun 1 15:46:53 PDT 2009

Re: [us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread John Oliver
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 03:51:33PM -0700, Sander Temme wrote: On Jun 1, 2009, at 3:27 PM, Frank Gingras wrote: John, Then you are looking in the wrong error log, since a 403 is always logged. The other possibility is that you're hitting browser cache. Yes, but John's other e-mail

Re: [us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread Sander Temme
On Jun 1, 2009, at 3:24 PM, John Oliver wrote: [Mon Jun 01 15:21:19 2009] [debug] mod_deflate.c(447): [client 128.49.61.83] Zlib: Compressed 305 to 232 : URL /index.html So it's trying to serve you something. This is probably the internally generated response from the server after it

Re: [us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread Jonas Eckerman
John Oliver wrote: You don't have permission to access / on this server. [...] There is an index.html with 644, and it's in /var/www/html with 755, and that is set as the DocumentRoot. And DirectoryIndex is set to use it? Regards /Jonas -- Jonas Eckerman Fruktträdet Förbundet Sveriges

Re: [us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread John Oliver
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 04:10:24PM -0700, Sander Temme wrote: On Jun 1, 2009, at 3:24 PM, John Oliver wrote: [Mon Jun 01 15:21:19 2009] [debug] mod_deflate.c(447): [client 128.49.61.83] Zlib: Compressed 305 to 232 : URL /index.html So it's trying to serve you something. This is

Re: [us...@httpd] https works, http doesn't

2009-06-01 Thread Sander Temme
On Jun 1, 2009, at 4:57 PM, John Oliver wrote: As you may know, if you don't put any content in /var/www/html, Red Hat will serve the 403 error page because it has configured Directory Listings of /var/www/html to be forbidden. By striking coincidence, that error page HTML document is dolled