2009/7/16 Nedim Ozan Tekin nte...@havelsan.com.tr:
What might be the problems? Do you have any idea?
1) Read this: http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
2) Once you've read this come back.
3) Don't hijack an existing thread, start a new one.
Krist
--
krist.vanbes...@gmail.com
Hello,
there is a problem with apache bundled with xampp
(xampp-win32-1.7.1-installer.exe).
I could track the problem to a trivial preg_match command in php, which runs
perfectly on the command line, but not from the server.
The help on the net via a google search was pretty confusing.
I tried
I'm using mod_perl to serve mason pages.
Directory /var/www/html/codebank
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler HTML::Mason::ApacheHandler
AddType text/html mhtml
AddType text/html comp
AddHandler perl-script mhtml comp
/Directory
If I load *localhost/codebank/index.html*,
ML wrote:
Hi Tom,
Say I have a directory of files that contain my MySQL connection
information, queries, etc, etc.
How do I prevent people from browsing the directory but allow the
files to still be used when I include them in a page. Say to connect
to MySQL.
Don't ever put them inside your
If a client requests an XHTML file, it says to do normal
content-negotiation. If the client's HTTP Accept header says they like
text/html more, send them that. If it says they like application/xhtml+xml
more, send them that.
Fine. I have even done that successfully with two different files.
I've never even saw, an example of 2 certs for 2 domains in same VH
Show me httpd.conf syntax
You need two certs. www.domain.com and domain.com.
Redirect won't work in this case because it is done at the HTTP layer
and the SSL handshake occurs before the GET request.
--
Aaron
You can not, as SSL mismatch error is trigered for one in FF for example
and all other major browsers
- Original Message -
From: Jonas Eckerman jonas_li...@frukt.org
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:10:25 +0200
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] SSL cert for alias too
SSL
Igor...
You have 2 SAME rewrite rules!
Now I will translate what they mean:
IF page is requested on NON-SSL port 80 THEN rewrite url to SSL version of
it, with www..., -- redir 301, last(stop rewriting)
NOW, do you understand that second rewrite block inside VirtualHost
_default_:443 will
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
If a client requests an XHTML file, it says to do normal
content-negotiation.
No, if a client asks for the URL /abc/file.html, it wants the resource
corresponding to that URL.
If the client's HTTP Accept header says they like
text/html more, send them that.
So it's not possible to serve one file with two different Content-Types,
and you think that is as it should be?
Did you read the part about why XHTML should be served to some clients as
text/html, and others as application/xhtml+xml?
application/xhtml+xml is the correct Content-Type for xhtml.
rank1see...@gmail.com wrote:
Use one cert issued for both hosts.
You can not, as SSL mismatch error is trigered for one in FF for example
and all other major browsers
Not when I test with FF or IE. For example, the following three
hostnames (on three vhosts) uses the same certificate (with
dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
So it's not possible to serve one file with two different Content-Types,
and you think that is as it should be?
Yes, because it would be very confusing otherwise.
But it is not what I think that counts; what counts is the HTTP RFC.
Did you read the part about
I moved this bit to the top because I think it makes everything else
irrelevant:
Note however that old browsers who do not understand the type
application/xhtml+xml, are *really* old.
Note also that no matter what the server sends as Content-Type header,
if the browser is IE, it will
13 matches
Mail list logo