Hi,
I did run some openssl commands and here is what I saw.
# openssl s_client -connect :636
verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate
verify return:1
verify error:num=21:unable to verify the first certificate
verify return:1
No client certificate CA names sent
---
SSL handsha
Serge Fonville schrieb:
>
> It were it. But as module Apache running not and write no log. I
> don't know
>
> why apache dosen't start, when i write config for module.
>
>
> What steps have you taken to run it as a module, because all I needed to
> do was:
> Add php to the path
> Ad
Tosh Cooey wrote:
Everything looks fine, except this "Converting POST -> GET" part. I
don't know if it is, but I know that when the AUTH is working properly
that doesn't occur.
Ha. The POST -> GET conversion is a clever little trick of the author,
used only in some cases.
Reminder : A PO
Joe Nardone wrote:
We have an existing module on 1.3 which we're porting (finally) to
2.2. This is primarily a set of content handlers.
With content handlers, upgrading should be straightforward.
I'm seeing strange SSL behavior (all of our clients connect to this
through SSL). Specifically,
Silvio Siefke wrote:
Hello,
i want to configure Apache2 under Windows Server 2003.
The follow lines i have write:
Action application/x-httpd-php "/php/php-cgi.exe"
AddHandler application/x-httpd-php .php
That AddHandler is for mod_php. To run PHP as CGI, you'd
want the cgi-script Handler.
C
We have an existing module on 1.3 which we're porting (finally) to
2.2. This is primarily a set of content handlers.
I'm seeing strange SSL behavior (all of our clients connect to this
through SSL). Specifically, under 1.3 when our module would write
data (ap_rprintf) and then return OK, the hea
> It were it. But as module Apache running not and write no log. I don't know
why apache dosen't start, when i write config for module.
What steps have you taken to run it as a module, because all I needed to do
was:Add php to the path
Add a module line
Add phpinidir to httpd.conf
This is descr
Serge Fonville schrieb:
> > What is the reason you wan't to run php as cgi
>
> Yes i want when its run.
>
> Why do you want to run it as cgi?
> What makes that running as a module isn't an option?
It were it. But as module Apache running not and write no log. I don't know
why apache dose
>
> > What is the reason you wan't to run php as cgi
>
> Yes i want when its run.
>
Why do you want to run it as cgi?
What makes that running as a module isn't an option?
Regards,
Serge Fonville
>
>
> Now the follow entry in the log:
> [Mon Sep 21 20:01:10 2009] [error] [client] client denied b
Serge Fonville schrieb:
> What is the reason you wan't to run php as cgi
Yes i want when its run.
Now the follow entry in the log:
[Mon Sep 21 20:01:10 2009] [error] [client] client denied by server
configuration: C:/PHP/php-cgi.exe
php.conf
ScriptAlias /php/ "C:/php/"
AddHandler php-script .ph
Hi,
i want to configure Apache2 under Windows Server 2003.
>
> The follow lines i have write:
> Action application/x-httpd-php "/php/php-cgi.exe"
> AddHandler application/x-httpd-php .php
>
> Apache Dir > c:\apache2
> PHP Dir > c:\php
>
> The follow error Messages come:
> [Mon Sep 21 19:41:34 2009
Hello,
i want to configure Apache2 under Windows Server 2003.
The follow lines i have write:
Action application/x-httpd-php "/php/php-cgi.exe"
AddHandler application/x-httpd-php .php
Apache Dir > c:\apache2
PHP Dir > c:\php
The follow error Messages come:
[Mon Sep 21 19:41:34 2009] [error] [cli
I was running an Apache Server version 2.2 on Windows. I was using
ActiveState Perl as my perl installation. I had some other code which
was going to make a request of my IP address (http://127.0.0.1/), and
thus be requesting '/', I needed to redirect this request to a handler
script.
Thus I added
From: André Warnier
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 01:50:05 +0200
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Tosh Cooey wrote:
...
Maybe I'll bug the author of the module now.
I just had a quick look at AuthCookieDBI, which subclasses AuthCookie.
In AuthCookie->authenticate(), there is indeed a check for sub-reques
Hi all,
I am going to configure a LB in workers.properties. There are 3 workers.
>From the example from internet I found I have two alternatives:
Alternative1:
worker.list=worker_fathers1
worker.template.connection_pool_timeout=600
worker.template.socket_timeout=120
worker.template
* Asimananda Mohanty [2009-09-21 14:37]:
> Should I assume that the certificate presented to apache is not the correct
> one?
> But the same certificate works fine when I use it on my ldap server where
> the ldap client is also installed.
Get the ldap command line client to work on the same machi
Should I assume that the certificate presented to apache is not the correct
one?
But the same certificate works fine when I use it on my ldap server where
the ldap client is also installed.
Regards
Asimananda
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Peter Schober
wrote:
> * Asimananda Mohanty [2009-09-
* Asimananda Mohanty [2009-09-21 14:11]:
> I can see client hello, server hello, certificate from server, server hello
> done, encrypted handshake messages on my packet sniffer.
> Well, I can see some checksum error in the server hello, certificate,
> encrypted handshake messages.
>
> For all the
I can see client hello, server hello, certificate from server, server hello
done, encrypted handshake messages on my packet sniffer.
Well, I can see some checksum error in the server hello, certificate,
encrypted handshake messages.
For all the above messages, port 636 on my ldap server has been u
* André Warnier [2009-09-21 13:51]:
> If "ldaps" means "secure LDAP" (as in SSL), then all packets would
> be encrypted, and your protocol analyser may just not be able to
> detect them.
Well, at least a TCP connect to (default) port 636 should be in the
trace (not that I'm saying there is) or in
Asimananda Mohanty wrote:
Hi,
In continuation to my below mails :
I snooped the packets and found that in case of "ldap" url, apache is
sending bind request towards my ldap server whereas in case of "ldaps" url,
no such bind request towards ldap server is seen.
Are you sure ?
If "ldaps" means
Hi,
In continuation to my below mails :
I snooped the packets and found that in case of "ldap" url, apache is
sending bind request towards my ldap server whereas in case of "ldaps" url,
no such bind request towards ldap server is seen.
Regards
Asimananda
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Asimana
Hi Eric,
I have changed the permission level of the certificate presented to apache
but still I have got no success.
Here are the logs from my apache.
During Startup :
[Mon Sep 21 13:31:22 2009] [notice] LDAP: Built with OpenLDAP LDAP SDK
[Mon Sep 21 13:3
23 matches
Mail list logo
