Re: [users@httpd] mod_cache serves diffrent content for Firefox and Chrome

2011-06-14 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - Hi! I'm using following configuration of mod_cache: CacheEnable disk / CacheIgnoreCacheControl On     IfModule mod_cache.c   CacheIgnoreNoLastMod On   CacheDefaultExpire 240     IfModule mod_mem_cache.c     CacheEnable mem /     MCacheSize 4096    

Re: [users@httpd] Re: Drupal and Apache and mysql work if I cease using https - why?

2011-06-14 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - You need to enable HTTPS in apache. Are you running your own apache server? If so then read this article: http://beeznest.wordpress.com/2008/04/25/how-to-configure-https-on-apache-2/ Please link to the real documentation.. which reminds me. Why don't we have

Re: [users@httpd] General question - Apache server-status page

2011-06-14 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - Thanks for the info I will look in to it with our Hosting provider.. and see what we can do… sound s a bit complicated, but maybe worth it in the end… Of course you can always throw more hardware at it..

RE: [users@httpd] mod_cache serves diffrent content for Firefox and Chrome

2011-06-14 Thread Marcin Kwiatkowski
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:18:21 + From: i.ga...@brainsware.org To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] mod_cache serves diffrent content for Firefox and Chrome - Original Message - Hi! I'm using following

Re: [users@httpd] mod_cache serves diffrent content for Firefox and Chrome

2011-06-14 Thread Eric Covener
Sorry, I omitted them since they look almost the same: any vary headers in the response? - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html for more info.

RE: [users@httpd] mod_cache serves diffrent content for Firefox and Chrome

2011-06-14 Thread Marcin Kwiatkowski
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:32:28 -0400 From: cove...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] mod_cache serves diffrent content for Firefox and Chrome Sorry, I omitted them since they look almost the same: any vary

Re: [users@httpd] How to run a backup server?

2011-06-14 Thread Igor Galić
- Original Message - Hmmm well in *that* case, seems like your choices are: 1. pay for VPS 2. relax your constraint about 5 TB of data 3. build a server center from the ground up with reliable power (among other things). Pays yer money, takes yer choice. You may *like* to use a

RE: [users@httpd] mod_cache serves diffrent content for Firefox and Chrome

2011-06-14 Thread Marcin Kwiatkowski
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:32:28 -0400 From: cove...@gmail.com To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [users@httpd] mod_cache serves diffrent content for Firefox and Chrome Sorry, I omitted them since they look almost the same: any vary headers

Re: [users@httpd] mod_cache serves diffrent content for Firefox and Chrome

2011-06-14 Thread Eric Covener
Your question makes much more sense after I looked at source code. Can it be the case that there are two different responses because of two different Accept-Encoding headers: gzip, deflate and gzip,deflate,sdch ? In this case there would have to be, and you could probably even find them in

Re: [users@httpd] How to run a backup server?

2011-06-14 Thread Lester Caine
John Hudak wrote: Hmmm well in *that* case, seems like your choices are: 1. pay for VPS 2. relax your constraint about 5 TB of data 3. build a server center from the ground up with reliable power (among other things). Pays yer money, takes yer choice. You may *like* to use a real DB, but are

Re: [users@httpd] How to run a backup server?

2011-06-14 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 06/14/2011 03:53 PM, Igor Galić wrote: - Original Message - Hmmm well in *that* case, seems like your choices are: 1. pay for VPS 2. relax your constraint about 5 TB of data 3. build a server center from the ground up with reliable power (among other things). Pays yer money, takes

Re: [users@httpd] How to run a backup server?

2011-06-14 Thread John Hudak
I don't know the details of what you are attempting, however, from my reading of the issue, you want a reliable backup of your server configuration. Someone suggested a VPS which, in my mind is a reasonable solution. I interpreted your reaction to this possibility as way too expensive because of