Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??

2014-04-21 Thread Oscar Knorn
On 10.04.2014 19:43, Joey J wrote: Apache 2.4 has had a stable release out for over 2 years but is only used by 2.5% of active Apache sites. Why is the adoption so low?? The Apache foundation has been recommending upgrading to 2.4 for some time and looking at the improvements I see

[users@httpd] Re: Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??

2014-04-21 Thread Good Guy
On 10/04/2014 18:43, Joey J wrote: Apache 2.4 has had a stable release out for over 2 years but is only used by 2.5% of active Apache sites. Why is the adoption so low?? The Apache foundation has been recommending upgrading to 2.4 for some time and looking at the improvements I see significant

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 - non adoption reasons??

2014-04-21 Thread Brett @Google
Apache 2.4 is technically better and many commonly use components have been pulled into the Apache core, which had to be manually compiled before, but pulling in some modules and changing them for Apache 2.4 broke compatibility with said external modules, ie. importing mod_proxy_html but not

[users@httpd] Re:

2014-04-21 Thread cpanon
Hi! http://66.71.163.250/_redirect?zomofos105170 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

Re: [users@httpd] Re:

2014-04-21 Thread Phil
On 22-Apr-14 12:14 PM, cpa...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi! http://66.71.163.250/_redirect?zomofos105170 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org 'green