Re: [users@httpd] Cannot run CGI scripts in user directory

2016-05-21 Thread Nick Kew
On Sun, 2016-05-22 at 04:05 +0100, Alessandro Re wrote: > #!/usr/bin/sh Is that a typo or an unusual filesystem? Does your script run from the commandline (as "/path/to/test.cgi", not as "sh test.cgi")? -- Nick Kew - To

[users@httpd] Cannot run CGI scripts in user directory

2016-05-21 Thread Alessandro Re
Dear community, I do not like to cross-post, but I cannot find a solution to this problem (yes, I searched). The discussion started at [1], but I am seeking help also here, because I cannot get what is wrong and I cannot understand how to get more detailed error logs - so I thought that a

Re: [users@httpd] Possible DOS Attack

2016-05-21 Thread Yehuda Katz
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Kurtis Rader wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Roman Gelfand > wrote: > >> Also, what does this mean? >> > >> ::1 - - [20/May/2016:18:26:09 -0400] "OPTIONS * HTTP/1.0" 200 - "-" >> "Apache/2.4.6 (Red Hat

[users@httpd] Apache mod_dav alternatives?

2016-05-21 Thread Bjoern Voigt
I am using Apache as a web and proxy server, but I am unhappy with Apache as a WebDAV file server. I am missing a good file permission or ACL configuration in Apache mod_dav. My wishlist: * "good/flexible" permission control (important) * stable and secure (important) * Apache >= 2.4

[users@httpd] mod_proxy_wstunnel with Unix domain sockets

2016-05-21 Thread Michael Fladischer
Hi folks, I have a Python ornado base websocket application that listens on a Unix domain socket. It was initially written to work with nginx as its frontend webserver. Now i'm trying to make it work with Apache but it seems that mod_proxy_wstunnel is not meant to work with Unix domain sockets.

Re: [users@httpd] Possible DOS Attack

2016-05-21 Thread Richard
> Date: Saturday, May 21, 2016 09:22:24 -0400 > From: "D'Arcy J.M. Cain" > > On 5/20/16 4:00 PM, Roman Gelfand wrote: >> In the last 2 days we have received roughly 1milion of the >> following requests. Just to confirm, is this a DOS attack? >> >> 191.96.249.52 - -

Re: [users@httpd] Possible DOS Attack

2016-05-21 Thread Michael A. Peters
On 05/21/2016 06:22 AM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: victim but if the coders of these things were smart they would be making real money with legitimate work. Not always that simple. A lot of smart people have trouble getting hired. As for the break-in attempt, there are enough common passwords