Re: [users@httpd] 2.4 named virtual hosts question

2016-09-11 Thread Eric Covener
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >>The first one will always be a default. You can make a dedicated one for it. > > Thank you. I appreciate your timely reply, however I think that maybe > you didn't quite get my point and/or my question. > > I simply do not want there

Re: [users@httpd] 2.4 named virtual hosts question

2016-09-11 Thread Jim Walls
On 9/11/2016 19:00, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: Eric Covener wrote: The first one will always be a default. You can make a dedicated one for it. Thank you. I appreciate your timely reply, however I think that maybe you didn't quite get my point and/or my question. I simply do not want there

Re: [users@httpd] 2.4 named virtual hosts question

2016-09-11 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
Eric Covener wrote: >The first one will always be a default. You can make a dedicated one for it. Thank you. I appreciate your timely reply, however I think that maybe you didn't quite get my point and/or my question. I simply do not want there to exist a default vhost, period. Isn't there a

Re: [users@httpd] 2.4 named virtual hosts question

2016-09-11 Thread Eric Covener
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > How can I get rid of that while still providing service > for my three vhosts? The first one will always be a default. You can make a dedicated one for it. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com -

[users@httpd] 2.4 named virtual hosts question

2016-09-11 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette
A simple question. Sorry if this is an FAQ. I'm just bringing up a fresh VM system that I plan to move my small handful of web sites to. I'v so far managed to mostly get apache24 installed and configured. I've moved all of my web sites over to the new system, and it mostly all seems to be worki