Re: [users@httpd] multiple internal websites

2020-09-23 Thread Yehuda Katz
The best choice would be to register a real domain name. Because of the gTLD program, almost anything can now be registered on the internet, so you will keep having issues. You could use .example or .test which shouldn't ever be on the public internet, or you could use .internal which might be

[users@httpd] multiple internal websites

2020-09-23 Thread Manning Allan
Hi, I am quite familiar with hosting multiple domains on a single server using apache virtual hosts. I rent a web server and am running 16 domains (currently) for myself, family and friends. Now I need to host some internal only websites for my employer (employees get free wifi in the

Re: [users@httpd] Bypass Authn

2020-09-23 Thread vadud3
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:15 PM Eric Covener wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:11 PM wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > I am using this config and I am not able to connect to /mydir/noauth > without authentication. > > > > ProxyPass /mydir http://example.org/mydir > > ProxyPassReverse /mydir

Re: [users@httpd] Bypass Authn

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Covener
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:11 PM wrote: > > Hi All, > > I am using this config and I am not able to connect to /mydir/noauth without > authentication. > > ProxyPass /mydir http://example.org/mydir > ProxyPassReverse /mydir https://example.org/mydir > > >Require all granted > > > >

[users@httpd] Bypass Authn

2020-09-23 Thread vadud3
Hi All, I am using this config and I am not able to connect to /mydir/noauth without authentication. ProxyPass /mydir http://example.org/mydir ProxyPassReverse /mydir https://example.org/mydir Require all granted Order allow,deny Allow from all AuthType

Re: [users@httpd] Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ?

2020-09-23 Thread Kapil Awate
Thanks ! From: Jim Jagielski Reply to: "users@httpd.apache.org" Date: Wednesday, 23 September 2020 at 5:20 PM To: "users@httpd.apache.org" Subject: Re: [users@httpd] Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ? Yes it is. On Sep 23, 2020, at 3:15 AM, Kapil Awate

Re: [users@httpd] HTTP 3 support in apache

2020-09-23 Thread Eric Covener
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 10:49 PM alchemist vk wrote: > > Hi all, > I would like to know, when we can have HTTP3 support in apache webserver > stack. I know that apache not yet committed an affirmative date for support, > but even if it is tentative also, it's helpful to me. > > Pls share the

Re: [users@httpd] Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ?

2020-09-23 Thread Jim Jagielski
Yes it is. > On Sep 23, 2020, at 3:15 AM, Kapil Awate > wrote: > > Hi All, > > We are planning to upgrade apache to 2.4.46 from 2.4.6. Is Apache 2.4.46 is > backward compatible with 2.4.6 ? Can anyone help me with this ? > > Thanks, > Kapil > > This email and any attachments thereto may

[users@httpd] Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ?

2020-09-23 Thread Kapil Awate
Hi All, We are planning to upgrade apache to 2.4.46 from 2.4.6. Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ? Can anyone help me with this ? Thanks, Kapil This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and/or privileged material for the sole use of the

[users@httpd] Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ?

2020-09-23 Thread Kapil Awate
Hi All, We are planning to upgrade apache to 2.4.46 from 2.4.6. Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ? Can anyone help me with this ? Thanks, Kapil This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and/or privileged material for the sole use of the

[users@httpd] Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ?

2020-09-23 Thread Kapil Awate
Hi All, We are planning to upgrade apache to 2.4.46 from 2.4.6. Is Apache 2.4.46 is backward compatible with 2.4.6 ? Can anyone help me with this ? Thanks, Kapil This email and any attachments thereto may contain private, confidential, and/or privileged material for the sole use of the