Re: [users@httpd] Bug in mod_proxy_balancer or just a bad configuration?

2021-06-15 Thread Nick Folino
So I changed the config to eliminate the order question: Header add Set-Cookie "RZROUTEID=.%{BALANCER_WORKER_ROUTE}e; path=/" env=BALANCER_ROUTE_CHANGED BalancerMember http://www.google.com route=01 BalancerMember http://www.yahoo.com route=02 ProxySet stickysession=RZROUTEID

Re: [users@httpd] Bug in mod_proxy_balancer or just a bad configuration?

2021-06-15 Thread Nick Folino
I thought that too, but if the rz proxypass was catching all traffic for rz2, then I wouldn't expect any traffic to get to rz2. But traffic does go to rz2 and all of that works, except it resets the rz route cookie. On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 3:27 PM Daniel Ferradal wrote: > If I am looking at it c

Re: [users@httpd] Bug in mod_proxy_balancer or just a bad configuration?

2021-06-15 Thread Daniel Ferradal
If I am looking at it correctly the order of the ProxyPass directives you defined is not the correct one, /sz defined first would be overriding /sz2. So sz2 should be defined first. Perhaps that's why you are getting wrong values ? (Browser cache or similar?) El mar., 15 jun. 2021 19:00, Nick Fol

[users@httpd] Bug in mod_proxy_balancer or just a bad configuration?

2021-06-15 Thread Nick Folino
I ran into an interesting situation with cookies being reset in balancers. I couldn't find any documentation on whether numbers are allowed in balancer names. I have this config: Header add Set-Cookie "RZROUTEID=.%{BALANCER_WORKER_ROUTE}e; path=/" env=BALANCER_ROUTE_CHANGED Balanc