Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GET /somefilename.htm ... Would a browser do this?

2005-07-31 Thread Dan Goodes
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 at 21:11, Chase wrote: Assuming someone types www.somedomainname.com/somefilename.htm into the location field in their favorite browser... A browser would never request like this would it: GET /somefilename.htm ?? Since so many websites are using shared ip

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GET /somefilename.htm ... Would a browser do this?

2005-07-31 Thread Dan Goodes
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 at 21:40, Chase wrote: Is the GET request always rooted at / ? Actually, I tell a lie. The format of a request COULD be GET http://www.somedomainname.com/somefilename.htm HTTP/1.1 although this form of request is likely only when talking to a proxy server. Have a read of

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Rewrite / reverse proxy question

2005-07-28 Thread Dan Goodes
to use No-Case for) HTH. Regards, Dan Goodes : Systems Programmer : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help support PlanetMirror - Australia's largest Internet archive by signing up for PlanetMirror Premium : http://planetmirror.com

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Large file (4219052708 bytes) not shown in Index display

2005-07-24 Thread Dan Goodes
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 at 19:01, Matt England wrote: A file (named /x/y/tmp/bigfile for this example) of size 4219052708 bytes did not display in my browser for my Apache 2.0.52 server. Any ideas why not? All the other files had no problems with this display. I suspect it has to do with the

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Large file (4219052708 bytes) not shown in Index display

2005-07-24 Thread Dan Goodes
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 at 19:34, Matt England wrote: At 7/24/2005 07:29 PM, Dan Goodes wrote: Unfortunately the only solution for your problem is to use an FTP server for that file. Stable Apache releases simply won't serve it. Ok, this all makes sense, and it's not a big deal right now

Re: [users@httpd] Large File Support in Apache 1.3.33

2005-07-10 Thread Dan Goodes
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 at 16:06, Joe Orton wrote: On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 08:10:42AM +1000, Dan Goodes wrote: Hi Folks I remember reading somewhere that Apache 1.3.33 supposedly supports large files 2G on 32-bit systems. However I'm not having much success. No, this won't work in 1.3 since