[users@httpd] DNFTEC was Re: [users@httpd] Professional Product

2021-04-30 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
up Apache supporters; your patience is appreciated by the majority of us! And we don't swear and blame you when we can't come to grips with reality! Regards, John -- *Kevin A. McGrail* /CEO Emeritus/ *Peregrine Computer Consultants Corporation* +1.703.798.0171

[users@httpd] Re: Rules Published

2015-06-14 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 6/14/2015 8:47 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Happy to report that after the server issue and then then SVN maintenance ruined rules for too long, we are back to publishing as of last night. My apologies. I apparently can't keep lists straight

[users@httpd] Rules Published

2015-06-14 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Happy to report that after the server issue and then then SVN maintenance ruined rules for too long, we are back to publishing as of last night. Regards, KAM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For

[users@httpd] Mirror Issue for 2.2.29 - 404

2015-05-15 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
FYI: wget http://apache.mesi.com.ar//httpd/httpd-2.2.29.tar.gz --2015-05-15 10:33:31-- http://apache.mesi.com.ar//httpd/httpd-2.2.29.tar.gz Resolving apache.mesi.com.ar... 2400:cb00:2048:1::681c:1647, 2400:cb00:2048:1::681c:1747, 104.28.23.71, ... Connecting to

[users@httpd] Re: spam

2015-04-16 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
riaditeľ Hroznová 4664/9 902 01 Pezinok +421 948 605 300 i...@odpadovyhospodar.sk mailto:i...@odpadovyhospodar.sk www.odpadovyhospodar.sk http://www.odpadovyhospodar.sk/ *From:*Kevin A. McGrail [mailto:kmcgr...@pccc.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, April 15, 2015 4:10 PM *To:* Odpadový hospodár s.r.o

[users@httpd] Fwd: Re: effectiveness of DCC checks?

2015-04-16 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Vernon, do you have a recommended score for the implementation of DCC with SA? There are concerns that bulk mail from good senders has been hit by DCC which is completely by design. Vernon replied off-list so I wanted to bring the relevant portion back to the list: My general suggestion is

[users@httpd] Ignore, wrong list, sorry - Re: Fwd: Re: effectiveness of DCC checks?

2015-04-16 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 4/16/2015 6:54 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Vernon, do you have a recommended score for the implementation of DCC with SA? There are concerns that bulk mail from good senders has been hit by DCC which is completely by design. Vernon replied off-list so I wanted to bring the relevant

[users@httpd] Sorry AGAIN wrong list --Re: spam

2015-04-16 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Sorry again to the httpd team. It's not my intention to troll for more committers on the SA project by posting here. ;-) Nope, my issue is a very simple problem some other Thunderbird users might understand in that there have been problems where the address book has suddenly forgotten the

[users@httpd] SpamRATS RBL?

2015-03-18 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Anyone use this RBL or familiar with it? Pros/cons? Efficacy data? regards, KAM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@httpd.apache.org

[users@httpd] Re: SpamRATS RBL?

2015-03-18 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 3/18/2015 10:07 AM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Anyone use this RBL or familiar with it? Pros/cons? Efficacy data? Incorrectly posted to Http, please ignore. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org

[users@httpd] Protect server-status with https required?

2013-06-18 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Hello All, We are protecting server-status and info with basic auth using a config block similar to the following: Location /server-info SetHandler server-info #Order deny,allow #Deny from all #Allow from .example.com AuthType basic AuthName Apache Info

Re: [users@httpd] Protect server-status with https required?

2013-06-18 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 6/18/2013 10:11 PM, Jim Albert wrote: This should be relevant: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_ssl.html#sslrequiressl Thanks Jim. That worked like a charm. regards, KAM - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [users@httpd] Apache not responding to external requests

2013-04-19 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 4/19/2013 9:44 AM, Neil Aggarwal wrote: This is strange. I did a fresh install of CentOS 6.4 on a virtual server and then did a yum install httpd. The apache server responds to local requests but not requests over eth0. I checked the Listen directive in httpd.conf and it is not restricted.

Re: [users@httpd] [warn] Init: Session Cache is not configured [hint: SSLSessionCache]

2013-02-27 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 2/27/2013 2:10 PM, Matthew Smith wrote: Trying to get openssl to work locally. This is the error in my log file: [warn] Init: Session Cache is not configured [hint: SSLSessionCache] It led me to this via google, and I tried to make sure it was implemented properly:

Re: [users@httpd] [warn] Init: Session Cache is not configured [hint: SSLSessionCache]

2013-02-27 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 2/27/2013 3:27 PM, Matthew Smith wrote: I meant to have it off the base path. Then remove the leading slash. I wonder if you are loading the module for mod_ssl.c earlier in your config? I seem to remember I get this error even on servers where I don't have mod_ssl enabled. regards, KAM

Re: [users@httpd] Fwd: Apache plugin malware

2012-12-20 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Thanks Nick! Sounds a lot like this much more detailed account: http://blog.unmaskparasites.com/2012/09/10/malicious-apache-module-injects-iframes/ Regards, KAM - To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@httpd.apache.org

[users@httpd] Fwd: Apache plugin malware

2012-12-19 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
http://arstechnica.com/security/2012/12/apache-plugin-turns-legit-sites-into-bank-attack-platforms/ Annoyingly, the article doesn't say what plugin names to look for. Anyone know if this is something we should be looking for? Any specific plugin names, etc.? Regards, KAM

Re: [users@httpd] 403 Forbidden ...

2012-11-13 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 11/13/2012 11:12 AM, Lester Caine wrote: Ben Johnson wrote: You, good sir, would be well-served to install mod_info, which will tell you exactly which directives are being applied to which containers. We can guess at this all day, but there are a number of reasons for which you might be

Re: [users@httpd]

2012-10-31 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 11/1/2012 12:59 AM, ABHISHEK GUPTA wrote: I want to configure apache in a way that all the request from mobile browsers are redirected to a separate virtualhost and requests from desktop browsers are served from another virtualhost. Abhishek, Because I recommend that the mobile site have

Re: [users@httpd] availability of httpd 2.0.65

2012-10-02 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 10/2/2012 7:34 AM, Regev Ayelet wrote: Even after installing httpd patch provided by Apache, nessus scanning system is claiming: You have to email your scanning company and let them know it is patched. They are only checking the version of Apache and most scanners are pretty stupid at

Re: [users@httpd] availability of httpd 2.0.65

2012-10-02 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 10/2/2012 7:41 AM, Regev Ayelet wrote: Thank you for the quick response... Do you know when 2.0.65 will be ready? Other than the same information you have that they are working on a release, no. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [users@httpd] Download breaks in the middle

2012-09-14 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 9/14/2012 12:24 AM, val john wrote: im hosting close to 20 zip files in my site each close to 180MB in size , some times when i download one of the files .. its stops in the middle ( after 80MB ) ,And some times it get downloaded full file without any problem . is there any thing that i

Re: [users@httpd] Download breaks in the middle

2012-09-14 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 9/14/2012 10:37 AM, Tom Evans wrote: Timeout is for individual read/writes. You can still download files that take longer than Timeout seconds to download :) Good point. I use a cgi that runs and actually sends the files which I think is why I run afoul of this. Regards, KAM

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4.2 Error Log Oddness

2012-08-29 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 8/28/2012 7:59 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: IIRC, this has always been the behavior of mod_cgid -- anything the mod_cgid daemon process needs to log is written to its stderr, which is the main server error log. Makes sense. Any thoughts on the impact of switching away from an event based MPM

[users@httpd] Apache 2.4.2 Error Log Oddness

2012-08-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Morning All, From the docs at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/logs.html, we have: If |CustomLog http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_log_config.html#customlog| or |ErrorLog http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/core.html#errorlog| directives are placed inside a |VirtualHost

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4.2 Error Log Oddness

2012-08-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 8/28/2012 11:06 AM, Eric Covener wrote: The same errors duplicated, or a mix? Are you sure the only local interface used is 1.2.3.4? If it's munged.com on any other interface, it won't use that VH. Different errors and using multiple IPs sorry. A more complete config file is attached with

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4.2 Error Log Oddness

2012-08-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 8/28/2012 12:15 PM, Eric Covener wrote: Perhaps all the captured stderr is somehow getting redirected to the default error log? Perhaps something to do with using suexec? Yes, stderr can only go one place, and it's the main server error log. This is independent of suexec. This changed for

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4.2 Error Log Oddness

2012-08-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 8/28/2012 12:30 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Are you using mod_cgid or mod_cgi with 2.0 and 2.2? Aha! No, I don't think so, no. Spot checking a 2.2 server, I do not have mod_cgi(d). However, on this 2.4 server, I do have mod_cgid enabled right now because without it, my cgis were not being

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4.2 Error Log Oddness

2012-08-28 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 8/28/2012 1:50 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote: On 8/28/2012 12:30 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: Are you using mod_cgid or mod_cgi with 2.0 and 2.2? Aha! No, I don't think so, no. Spot checking a 2.2 server, I do not have mod_cgi

[users@httpd] Basic Auth Authentication Wonkiness with scripts or Static HTML not protected by Basic Auth accessing resources protected by Basic Auth In when using Apache Internet Explorer

2012-01-16 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
I have a set of pictures that I protect with .htaccess. This is currently configured using Basic Auth. The .htaccess file protects ONLY the images/thumbnails but not the html that loads the images and thumbnails. AuthName POAC-NoVA Members Only AuthType Basic AuthUserFile

Re: [users@httpd] Basic Auth Authentication Wonkiness with scripts or Static HTML not protected by Basic Auth accessing resources protected by Basic Auth In when using Apache Internet Explorer

2012-01-16 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
How exactly do you protect the resources? Via Directory or FileMatch? the /photos/ dir has a .htaccess file in it that uses this .htaccess file: AuthName POAC-NoVA Members Only AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /var/opt/htdocs/poac/.htpasswd require valid-user That would be via Directory, yes?

Re: [users@httpd] Basic Auth Authentication Wonkiness with scripts or Static HTML not protected by Basic Auth accessing resources protected by Basic Auth In when using Apache Internet Explorer

2012-01-16 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 1/16/2012 4:29 PM, Igor Cicimov wrote: I have a feeling that IE and FF exibit the same behavor its just that FF automatically supplies the credentials without prompting you all the time. I had similar thoughts. However, with IE, I typically will get some password error log entries

Re: [users@httpd] attack on apache

2012-01-11 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
any idea how to start researching which is the leaky script Checking the access log for the same ip that was getting the errors you found in the error_log is a good start. - The official User-To-User support

Re: [users@httpd] Update on mod_setenvif exploit CVE-2011-3607 and CVE-2011-4415

2012-01-06 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Anyway, I am more wondering if 2.2.22 is even on track to address these issues. Or if there are patches for 2.2.X (I found trunk patches but they only dealt with some of the CVE and didn't address the 2.2 branch). The amount of information available for these CVEs since sparse compared to

[users@httpd] Update on mod_setenvif exploit CVE-2011-3607 and CVE-2011-4415

2011-12-21 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
Good Morning, I was wondering if there was any update on CVE-2011-3607 http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-3607 and CVE-2011-4415 http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2011-4415 which are bugs in mod_setenvif? Our server is being flagged for PCI

Re: [users@httpd] Update on mod_setenvif exploit CVE-2011-3607 and CVE-2011-4415

2011-12-21 Thread Kevin A. McGrail
On 12/21/2011 1:18 PM, Pete Houston wrote: On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 12:42:02PM -0500, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: Our server is being flagged for PCI non-compliance because of these CVE's but there doesn't appear to be a fix, a workaround or any information I can find. There seem to be 2 obvious