[users@httpd] mod_proxy_balancer and router_id cookie

files to find answer but with no luck. If you have the answer, I hear you :) Best regards, Sylvain

Re: [users@httpd] MPM Worker : Two processes launched with no activity

Thanks for your analysis Yann, i'll stay tuned on the dev mailing list. See you. On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Sylvain Goulmy wrote: > > > > No i don't use that directive, here is the extract of the running &

Re: [users@httpd] MPM Worker : Two processes launched with no activity

ThreadLimit *200* 87: ServerLimit *50* 88: ThreadsPerChild *50* 89: MaxRequestWorkers *150* 90: MinSpareThreads *10* 91: MaxSpareThreads *80* 93: StartServers *1* 107: GracefulShutDownTimeout *60* Regards Sylvain On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 11:44 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar

Re: [users@httpd] MPM Worker : Two processes launched with no activity

Hi Yann, Two children processes. And on the status page i can see : 1 requests currently being processed, 99 idle workers Regards. Sylvain On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Sylvain Goulmy > wrote: > > > > I'm

[users@httpd] MPM Worker : Two processes launched with no activity

any activity. What could explain this behaviour ? Thanks in advance for your support. Sylvain

Re: [users@httpd] Limit the number of connection per virtual host

> > Bear in mind that you only know which virtual host is requested > when you read the Host: header, which is after you already > accepted the connection. > There are third-party modules for managing loads and protecting > a server from attack. Some of them might be worth a look. I get your poi

Re: [users@httpd] Limit the number of connection per virtual host

e are often solutions around bandwith control which is a different problematic. If you have any suggestions, please do not hesitate to share them with me. Sylvain On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 12:18 +, Eric Covener wrote: > > > > Apach

Re: [users@httpd] Limit the number of connection per virtual host

Thank you for your feedback. But do you protect your platform then without such a functionality ? On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > - Can you confirm that Apache does not provide any mecanism allowing to >> limit the number of connection per virtual host, just to be sure th

[users@httpd] Limit the number of connection per virtual host

Moreover Apache provides many other complex functionalities, the one i'm describing would be probably something simple to implement compared to other functionalities already available. Thanks in advance for your feedbacks. Sylvain

[users@httpd] Warning at startup while using a variable set by rewrite rule in the ProxyPassReverseCookieDomain directive

solution to get rid of this warning ? I haven't found such thing in the documentation. Thanks in advance for your support. Sylvain

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 create a huge amount of shared memory segments

> I would recommend using mod_macro to help out with your migration; > you could create a macro Vhost definition... > > > On Dec 19, 2014, at 10:49 AM, Sylvain Goulmy wrote: > > > > Yann, > > > > I did some additionnal tests with the BalancerInherit directive. If

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 create a huge amount of shared memory segments

of my balancer states via a single URL. So before considering this option, as far as you know, do you think there is definitely no other options available. Regards. Sylvain On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > > Hi Sylvain, > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 create a huge amount of shared memory segments

I also forgot to mention that i have set the BalancerInherit to Off before loading the balancers definition. It unfortunatly doesn't change the behaviour. Sylvain On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Sylvain Goulmy wrote: > > Hi Yann, > > Thank you for your feedback. > &

Re: [users@httpd] Apache 2.4 create a huge amount of shared memory segments

hosts creates one shm for each balancer even if it doesn't refer it... Am i missing a directive that could avoid that behaviour or do i have to redesign my all configuration by moving each balancer definition at the virtual host level ? Thanks in advance. Regards. Sylvain On Fri, Dec 19, 2014

[users@httpd] Apache 2.4 create a huge amount of shared memory segments

I'm currently working on a migration from Apache 2.2 to 2.4 (2.4.10). I'm facing an issue with the usage of proxy_balancer with Apache 2.4. They now require the mod_slotmem_shm.so module to work correctly. I have added this module but i noticed that a single proxy_balancer now creates many memory

[us...@httpd] Re: mod_ext_filter with mode=input and ftype=AP_FTYPE_PROTOCOL : filter not executed

If somebody has an idea.. that would be very helpful. Thanks in advance! On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:15 AM, Sylvain Zimmer wrote: > Hi! > > I've been trying to setup a custom input filter that modifies http request > headers. > > Here is my config, at the end of apach

[us...@httpd] mod_ext_filter with mode=input and ftype=AP_FTYPE_PROTOCOL : filter not executed

r_debug" SetInputFilter radioclient and ExtFilterDefine radioclient ftype=30 mode=output cmd="/usr/bin/tee /tmp/ext_filter_debug" SetOutputFilter radioclient Is there a specific issue related to filtering input at the AP_FTYPE_PROTOCOL level ? Thanks a lot in advance! -- Sylvain Z

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache benchmark in reverse proxy scenario for large Web apps

Nick Kew a écrit : On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:20:34 +0200 "Sylvain Beaux" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi gays, Who??? so I calculate Max Client = 1300 Mb / (6,084 - 3660) = 540 processes, I prefered gaving some memory margin in case of ... Do you agree

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache benchmark in reverse proxy scenario for large Web apps

e_Configuration) Ie : to support fully 1500 processes : 1500* (6,084 - 3660) = 3600 Mb RAM And a last question, how do apache process chunk encoding requests ? is it allowing 1 process per connection ? so for 1000 simultaneous requests it will require 1000 processes ? thanks a

Re: [Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect URL with arguments]

Hi Severin thanks for your answer, but I'm still getting arguments in the URL when redirect is done. Unfortunately I'm not that good at mod_rewrite... Sylvain Severin Gehwolf wrote: Hi! thaznks for your answer. I've try to use : RedirectMatch /.* http://www.mydomain.com

Re: [Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect URL with arguments]

Hi Matus, thaznks for your answer. I've try to use : RedirectMatch /.* http://www.mydomain.com Unfortunately, I'm still getting redirect with the arguments I pass in the URL. Thanks, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 30.06.08 14:29, Sylvain Viollat wrote: Thanks for your answer

Re: [Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect URL with arguments]

Thanks for your answer. I've try to use Redirect instead of RedirectMatch but result is the same. I'm still getting redirect with the end of the URL. Eric Covener wrote: On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:46 AM, Sylvain Viollat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: RedirectMatch

[Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect URL with arguments]

Hello, anyone got an idea about how to do this ? Thanks --- Begin Message --- Hi, I need to redirect the URL http://www.mydomain.net/index.php?ref=10 to http://www.mydomain.com/. I've added the following line in www.mydomain.net VirtualHost : RedirectMatch permanent / http://www.mydomain

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Redirect URL with arguments

Hi, I need to redirect the URL http://www.mydomain.net/index.php?ref=10 to http://www.mydomain.com/. I've added the following line in www.mydomain.net VirtualHost : RedirectMatch permanent / http://www.mydomain.com The problem is that all queries which contain something after the .net/ (eg

[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reverse-proxy and Location headers rewriting

Hi all, I'm trying to use apache in a reverse-proxy mode. There are 3 feature I'd like to use: 1) URL rewriting 2) Cookie path rewriting 3) Location rewriting in case of 30x reply from my backend server I've made apache working for case 1) but there is something wrong in the second and the third

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url containing %2F / mod_rewrite

On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:10:06PM +0100, Sylvain Thénault wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:07:18PM +0100, Sylvain Thénault wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:39:22PM +, Nick Kew wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:31:18 +0100 > > > Sylvain Thénaul

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url containing %2F / mod_rewrite

On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:07:18PM +0100, Sylvain Thénault wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:39:22PM +, Nick Kew wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:31:18 +0100 > > Sylvain Thénault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Any hint on how can I acheive this

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url containing %2F / mod_rewrite

On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:39:22PM +, Nick Kew wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:31:18 +0100 > Sylvain Thénault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Any hint on how can I acheive this ? > > Upgrade to 2.2.8 and read the CHANGES file. Then you'll > know what to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url containing %2F / mod_rewrite

the "output" URI (the rewriten one) that is > decoded? yep, I really mean the input uri is decoded -- Sylvain Thénault LOGILAB, Paris (France) Formations Python, Zope, Plone, Debian: http://www.logilab.fr/formations Développement logiciel sur mesure:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] url containing %2F / mod_rewrite

my rewrite rules. I know that %2F may cause security issues, but that's not the point here, I only want apache to act as a good software doing what I'm asking it to do ;) Any hint on how can I acheive this ? Thanks in advance -- Sylvain Thénault LOGILAB, Pa

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SetEnvIf & SESSION_USE_TRANS_SID=0

.0 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html) > > Try: > SetEnvIf User-Agent "(.*)Googlebot(.*)" SESSION_USE_TRANS_SID=0 > > solprovider > > WARNING: Code was written freehand, is completely untested, and may > cause catastrophic failures. Use

Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SetEnvIf & SESSION_USE_TRANS_SID=0

Hello, does anyone know how to manage this ? Or maybe one of you know how to solve this session problem with googlebot ? Thanks for your help ! Original Message Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SetEnvIf & SESSION_USE_TRANS_SID=0 Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 12:39:13 +0200 From: Syl

[EMAIL PROTECTED] SetEnvIf & SESSION_USE_TRANS_SID=0

s properly set up but has no effect if I check a phpinfo (session.use_trans_sid still to On) I can't disable session.use_trans_sid for the whole website, but only if googlebot is coming. Thanks a lot for your help ! Regards, Sylvain, France -

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ProxyReverse perverse behavior

- Logan Pearsall Smith, 1931 > > - > The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. > See http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info. > To unsubscribe, e

[EMAIL PROTECTED] apache 2.2 reverse proxy ftp

Hello Everybody, May I use mod_proxy with mod_proxy_ftp for reverse proxying to a lan proftpd server? Thanks for your help. Sylvain - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project. See http