Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DirectoryIndex, DirectorySlash and mod_dav?

2006-07-11 Thread Brandon Fosdick
Joshua Slive wrote: > What are you trying to accomplish? As I said, activating DAV without > any DAV methods doesn't make any sense. I was trying to see if I could give my users a public_html directory within their DAV shares. > In addition, the use of "Dav UserDir" implies you are using some >

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DirectoryIndex, DirectorySlash and mod_dav?

2006-07-11 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/11/06, Brandon Fosdick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua Slive wrote: > Show us the config and log entries. In general, activating DAV for a > directory shouldn't change anything about GET/HEAD requests. This is the relevant bit from httpd.conf --- #Serve account public_html direct

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DirectoryIndex, DirectorySlash and mod_dav?

2006-07-11 Thread Brandon Fosdick
Joshua Slive wrote: > Show us the config and log entries. In general, activating DAV for a > directory shouldn't change anything about GET/HEAD requests. This is the relevant bit from httpd.conf --- #Serve account public_html directories DirectoryIndex index.html

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DirectoryIndex, DirectorySlash and mod_dav?

2006-07-11 Thread Joshua Slive
On 7/11/06, Brandon Fosdick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: As a quick hack I tried enabling mod_dav on a location to see if it would act as a storage backend for regular page serving. That is, just to use it for GET and HEAD requests and none of the other DAV-related requests. For the most part it

[EMAIL PROTECTED] DirectoryIndex, DirectorySlash and mod_dav?

2006-07-11 Thread Brandon Fosdick
As a quick hack I tried enabling mod_dav on a location to see if it would act as a storage backend for regular page serving. That is, just to use it for GET and HEAD requests and none of the other DAV-related requests. For the most part it works, but for some reason DirectorySlash and Director