Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject

2007-10-19 Thread Michael McGlothlin
GoDaddy offers it as an option. I assume the cert vendor will understand what that means? I was hoping to do the same with my ldap directory servers, one cert for ldap.foo.com, and ldap.foo.com load balanced across the physical boxes. On 19/10/2007, Ajai Khattri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject

2007-10-19 Thread Mark Drummond
I assume the cert vendor will understand what that means? I was hoping to do the same with my ldap directory servers, one cert for ldap.foo.com, and ldap.foo.com load balanced across the physical boxes. On 19/10/2007, Ajai Khattri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Peter Milanese

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject

2007-10-19 Thread Mark Drummond
We're a relatively small shop. We have some Cisco content switches, and the intent *is* to load balance across two physical boxes, but the SSL will be handled by the web servers themselves. Can I use the same cert on both machines? On 19/10/2007, Peter Milanese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject

2007-10-19 Thread Mark Drummond
it. - Original Message From: Mark Drummond [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: users@httpd.apache.org Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:25:54 AM Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject We're a relatively small

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject

2007-10-19 Thread Peter Milanese
: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject Unless you are using the load balancer ( hardware or software ) or a load balancing scheme it shouldn't matter. From: Mark Drummond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject

2007-10-19 Thread Peter Milanese
] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject !-- _filtered {font-family:Cambria Math;panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;} _filtered {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;} _filtered {font-family:Tahoma;panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;} /* Style Definitions

[EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject

2007-10-19 Thread jmacaranas
Unless you are using the load balancer ( hardware or software ) or a load balancing scheme it shouldn't matter. From: Mark Drummond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:09 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE: [SPAM] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] application.company.com vs. www.company.com/application? - Email found in subject

2007-10-19 Thread Ajai Khattri
On Fri, 19 Oct 2007, Peter Milanese wrote: As far as I know, no. Although, I've never really considered it. You can if its a wildcard certificate. -- Aj. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP