On 10/3/07, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No matter which solution you choose, the real problem is to detect that
the server fails.
If the server stops responding to requests, that's easy enough. However if
there is not a clear-cut failure, e.g. one server gradually slows
Hi list
I am looking for what's the best failover setup for apache websever. We are
running apache web server with lot of virtual hosting. Sometime the servers
fail which also makes all sites hosting at that server unavailable.
So I am looking for suggestions how to make his failures of web
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:04:29PM +0500, Asrai khn wrote:
So I am looking for suggestions how to make his failures of web server less
pain.
Lot of suggestions are possible, but they all inflict pain.
A very clean and widspread solution is to have two identical
webservers (use a deployment
Hey-
I ran LVS for about 5 years, mostly while it was in its infancy. We do over
a billion hits a year, and I had it running on VERY small machines, heading 4
others with many Vhosts. It cost a couple of grand for the two boxes.
The result of this was proof that we needed the solution,
octobre 2007 14:33
À : users@httpd.apache.org
Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web server fail over setup
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:04:29PM +0500, Asrai khn wrote:
So I am looking for suggestions how to make his failures of web server
less pain.
Lot of suggestions are possible, but they all
