: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error
Hello together,
i try to make apache 2.2.6 (i368) under 10.3.
my configure:
./configure --disable-ldap
When i start make, i get the following error (the same without --disable-ldap)
file included from /root/src/httpd-2.2.6/include/util_ldap.h:31
Hello together,
i try to make apache 2.2.6 (i368) under 10.3.
my configure:
./configure --disable-ldap
When i start make, i get the following error (the same without --disable-ldap)
file included from /root/src/httpd-2.2.6/include/util_ldap.h:31,
from exports.c:38:
@httpd.apache.org
Objet : [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error
Hello together,
i try to make apache 2.2.6 (i368) under 10.3.
my configure:
./configure --disable-ldap
When i start make, i get the following error (the same without --disable-ldap)
file included from /root/src/httpd-2.2.6/include/util_ldap.h:31
Trying to run make command with AIX 5.2 and Apache 1.3.37
Environment is set as follows:
_=/usr/bin/env
LANG=en_US
LOGIN=d47cs
This happens for me after make
___
include/apr_portable.h:46:23: #if with no expression
include/apr_portable.h:151:43: operator '' has no right operand
In file included from strings/apr_snprintf.c:23:
include/apr_portable.h:285: error: parse error before '*' token
On 1/29/07, herauthon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This happens for me after make
snip
Please tell us:
- Which version of apache you are trying to compile.
- On what OS you are trying to compile.
- What compiler you are using.
- What options you gave the configure command.
that would be a
On Jan 29, 2007, at 7:45 AM, herauthon wrote:
include/apr_portable.h:46:23: #if with no expression
Looks like APR_HAVE_PTHREAD_H is not set, and it's all pear-shaped
from there. This should not happen as it is defined in include/
apr.h, which is generated from include/apr.h.in by
- Original Message -
From: Krist van Besien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user)
On 1/29/07, herauthon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This happens for me after make
snip
Please
On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:12 AM, herauthon wrote:
- On what OS you are trying to compile.
** NetBSD 3.1 i386 on P-II MMX 333
Unfortunately, I haven ever had the chance to try compiling Apache on
netbsd.
- What options you gave the configure command.
** --enable-so
When you run
]
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 7:57 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user)
On Jan 29, 2007, at 10:12 AM, herauthon wrote:
- On what OS you are trying to compile.
** NetBSD 3.1 i386 on P-II MMX 333
Unfortunately, I haven ever had
problem solved - or no errors
did /configure without --enable-so ??
- Original Message -
From: herauthon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Monday, January 29, 2007 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error (embryo state user)
Before i send a load of snippets
On 12/14/06, K. Clair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/14/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:04:01AM -0600, K. Clair wrote:
I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries:
httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors
I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries:
httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors
on the same machine.
I also tried to compile httpd-2.0.57, and I got the same make error as
with 2.0.59. Again, all of this was done on the same system.
Has
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:04:01AM -0600, K. Clair wrote:
I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries:
httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors
on the same machine.
I also tried to compile httpd-2.0.57, and I got the same make error as
with
On 12/14/06, Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:04:01AM -0600, K. Clair wrote:
I don't think it has anything to do with the installed libraries:
httpd-2.0.55 with the same configure options compiles with no errors
on the same machine.
I also tried to compile
What version of gdbm is installed? Was it perhaps removed in a clean up of
the machine? I know under Debian deborphan always wants to remove
libgdbm-dev
On 12/12/06, K. Clair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade apache from 2.0.55 to 2.0.59. We have a
standard configure line
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade apache from 2.0.55 to 2.0.59. We have a
standard configure line that we have been using for the entire 2.0.x
release of apache:
./configure --enable-maintainer-mode --enable-proxy
--disable-proxy-connect --disable-proxy-ftp --enable-mods-shared=all
--with-dbm=gdbm
Howdy,
trying to build apache 2.2.3 on a Mac G4 (old, and slow) with OS X 10.4.
I'm trying to build with mod_ssl and a number of other modules, and ran
into the following error:
/usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols:
_X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [httpd]
Well it seems autoconf is borked on your box, because it should be test
compiling to determine if X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth is exported from
OpenSSL. Apparently not, on your build, but autoconf decides it is
successful.
You can try forcing the ac_cv_ flag for HAVE_X509_STORE_CTX_SET_DEPTH,
I
On Sep 29, 2006, at 2:24 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Well it seems autoconf is borked on your box, because it should be
test
compiling to determine if X509_STORE_CTX_set_depth is exported from
OpenSSL. Apparently not, on your build, but autoconf decides it is
successful.
Note that the
Sander,
I just managed to get the whole thing to make and make install without
error. What changed? I used fink to install the latest package available
for openssl on Mac that it had available, the one you cite below, 0.9.7i.
The one that was on this box originally was 0.9.6m. The one I
Hi,
I am trying to install apache2.0.55 on Solaris8 sparc machine.
These are the steps i followed.
1. FTPed the httpd-2.0.55-sparc-sun-solaris2.8.tar.gz at /export/home/netiq/apache55inst2. cd /export/home/netiq/apache55instgunzip httpd-2.0.55-sparc-sun-solaris2.8.tar.gz . (Got the
Krishna,
Use GNU make. Set your path so the GNU make is before the solaris make.
Having said that the much better option would be to download gcc from
www.sunfreeware.com and the latest source from apache.org and compile with
your specific options in configure. Of course use GNU make for this
I did find that RM and AWK needed their definitions added
in httpd-2.0.55/build/config_vars.mk. I'm using gawk-3.1.4
and getting:
awk -f
/export/home/jman/download/src/apache/httpd-2.0.55/srclib/apr/build/make_var
_export.awk
Hi Jon,
I suspect the base cause of your problems is the gcc version.
when I last installed apache on solaris8 x86, I used gcc 3.4.2 and
had no problems. 2.9.5 is very old.
rgds
I'm now trying to install 2.0.55 and receiving the
error below. I'm not using the ksh.
Found newer headers.
I've upgraded gcc to 3.3.2 on Solaris 8x86, and most
other build tools.(?) I'm now getting:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
ap_mpm_run server/.libs/libmain.a(main.o)
ap_send_error_response
I've upgraded gcc to 3.3.2 on Solaris 8x86, and most
other build tools.(?) I'm now getting:
I did find that RM and AWK needed their definitions added
in httpd-2.0.55/build/config_vars.mk. I'm using gawk-3.1.4
and getting:
awk -f
I'm now trying to install 2.0.55 and receiving the
error below. I'm not using the ksh.
Found newer headers. Will rebuild apr.exp.
-f apr.exp exports.c export_vars.h
/bin/ksh: -f: not found
make[3]: *** [delete-exports] Error 127
make[3]: Leaving directory
:38 AM
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error
I'm now trying to install 2.0.55 and receiving the
error below. I'm not using the ksh.
Found newer headers. Will rebuild apr.exp.
-f apr.exp exports.c export_vars.h
/bin/ksh: -f: not found
make[3]: *** [delete-exports] Error 127
make[3
Are these kinds of problems too vague or is
there a better place to ask?
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Mangin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 10:31 AM
Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] make error
I've worked around the previous error
30 matches
Mail list logo
