Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] RE : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass bug-closing?

2007-08-03 Thread Joshua Slive
On 8/3/07, Laurent FAILLIE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The same for me. And it was 2 very simple compilation problem under HP-UX that can be solve in 5 minutes :-(( Is 1.3 fasing out ? Yes, almost all development effort is targeted at 2.2 and up. 1.3 only gets the most critical fixes. There is

[EMAIL PROTECTED] RE : [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass bug-closing?

2007-08-03 Thread Laurent FAILLIE
The same for me. And it was 2 very simple compilation problem under HP-UX that can be solve in 5 minutes :-(( Is 1.3 fasing out ? --- Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Hello, two of my bugs (39910 and 25469) were closed a fre hours ago as WONTFIX. They were filled

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass bug-closing?

2007-08-03 Thread Boyle Owen
-Original Message- From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 10:49 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass bug-closing? Hello, two of my bugs (39910 and 25469) were closed a fre hours ago as WONTFIX. They were

[EMAIL PROTECTED] mass bug-closing?

2007-08-03 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
Hello, two of my bugs (39910 and 25469) were closed a fre hours ago as WONTFIX. They were filled against 1.3, but they are applicable for 2.0 and 2.2 too (afaik). Was there any mass closing for 1.3 bugs, or should I take it personally? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ;

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mass bug-closing?

2007-08-03 Thread Nick Kew
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 10:48:44 +0200 Matus UHLAR - fantomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, two of my bugs (39910 and 25469) were closed a fre hours ago as WONTFIX. They were filled against 1.3, but they are applicable for 2.0 and 2.2 too (afaik). Was there any mass closing for 1.3 bugs, or