Re: [us...@httpd] Apache HTTPD 2.2.6 + mod_ssl 2.2.6 -- odd error...

2010-12-01 Thread J.Lance Wilkinson
Sander Temme wrote: On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:37 PM, J.Lance Wilkinson wrote: But my httpd log files present an unexpected error each and every time a browser visits an SSL encrypted page (2 examples cited): So there is no discernible negative impact on the client? Correct. At the

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache HTTPD 2.2.6 + mod_ssl 2.2.6 -- odd error...

2010-12-01 Thread J.Lance Wilkinson
J.Lance Wilkinson wrote: Sander Temme wrote: On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:37 PM, J.Lance Wilkinson wrote: But my httpd log files present an unexpected error each and every time a browser visits an SSL encrypted page (2 examples cited): So there is no discernible negative impact on the client?

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache HTTPD 2.2.6 + mod_ssl 2.2.6 -- odd error...

2010-12-01 Thread Sander Temme
On Dec 1, 2010, at 7:30 AM, J.Lance Wilkinson wrote: In hindsight, the fact these messages were not prefixed by typical Apache error log tokens like like [timestamp] [severity] [client] should have been the tipoff here. That is true, log messages from the server (through

[us...@httpd] Apache HTTPD 2.2.6 + mod_ssl 2.2.6 -- odd error...

2010-11-30 Thread J.Lance Wilkinson
My organization recently switched its SSL Certificate vendor and the new supplier (COMODO) insists (reasonably) that we use 2048-bit Private and Public keys. So I take a running Apache installation, HTTPD v2.2.6, with mod_ssl v2.2.6 and openssl v0.9.8g running on Solaris 10, currently using a

Re: [us...@httpd] Apache HTTPD 2.2.6 + mod_ssl 2.2.6 -- odd error...

2010-11-30 Thread Sander Temme
On Nov 30, 2010, at 8:37 PM, J.Lance Wilkinson wrote: But my httpd log files present an unexpected error each and every time a browser visits an SSL encrypted page (2 examples cited): So there is no discernible negative impact on the client? User interface error unable to load Private Key