Re: [us...@httpd] Custom ETags

2010-04-15 Thread Brian Mearns
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Florian S. flo@gmx.net wrote: Am Dienstag, den 13.04.2010, 10:34 -0400 schrieb Brian Mearns: I'd like to use stronger and correlated ETag, namely the hash of the content being served. Obviously it's a drag to do this in-line, so I'm planning an automated

[us...@httpd] Custom ETags

2010-04-13 Thread Brian Mearns
I'd like to use stronger and correlated ETag, namely the hash of the content being served. Obviously it's a drag to do this in-line, so I'm planning an automated task to generate the ETag values and store them on the server. Is there any way I can get httpd to grab these stored values for use in

Re: [us...@httpd] Custom ETags

2010-04-13 Thread Jonathan Zuckerman
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Brian Mearns bmea...@ieee.org wrote: I'd like to use stronger and correlated ETag, namely the hash of the content being served. Obviously it's a drag to do this in-line, so I'm planning an automated task to generate the ETag values and store them on the

Re: [us...@httpd] Custom ETags

2010-04-13 Thread Brian Mearns
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Zuckerman j.zucker...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Brian Mearns bmea...@ieee.org wrote: I'd like to use stronger and correlated ETag, namely the hash of the content being served. Obviously it's a drag to do this in-line, so I'm

Re: [us...@httpd] Custom ETags

2010-04-13 Thread Jonathan Zuckerman
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Brian Mearns mearn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Zuckerman j.zucker...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Brian Mearns bmea...@ieee.org wrote: I'd like to use stronger and correlated ETag, namely the hash

Re: [us...@httpd] Custom ETags

2010-04-13 Thread Brian Mearns
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Jonathan Zuckerman j.zucker...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Brian Mearns mearn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Zuckerman j.zucker...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Brian Mearns

Re: [us...@httpd] Custom ETags

2010-04-13 Thread Jonathan Zuckerman
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Brian Mearns mearn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Jonathan Zuckerman j.zucker...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Brian Mearns mearn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Jonathan Zuckerman

Re: [us...@httpd] Custom ETags

2010-04-13 Thread Brian Mearns
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Jonathan Zuckerman j.zucker...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Brian Mearns mearn...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Jonathan Zuckerman j.zucker...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Brian Mearns

Re: [us...@httpd] Custom ETags

2010-04-13 Thread Florian S.
Am Dienstag, den 13.04.2010, 10:34 -0400 schrieb Brian Mearns: I'd like to use stronger and correlated ETag, namely the hash of the content being served. Obviously it's a drag to do this in-line, so I'm planning an automated task to generate the ETag values and store them on the server. Is