Re: [us...@httpd] ProxyPassing an HTTP PUT request

2009-04-22 Thread Nick Kew
Robert Banfield wrote: Nick Kew wrote: Once you've done that, we can figure out whether you have a bug, a misconfiguration, or misplaced expectations. The problem was in the next-hop webserver, not Apache. Thank you for your time. Thanks. That followup caught me just in time to save

Re: [us...@httpd] ProxyPassing an HTTP PUT request

2009-04-22 Thread Robert Banfield
Nick Kew wrote: Once you've done that, we can figure out whether you have a bug, a misconfiguration, or misplaced expectations. The problem was in the next-hop webserver, not Apache. Thank you for your time. - The offi

Re: [us...@httpd] ProxyPassing an HTTP PUT request

2009-04-22 Thread Robert Banfield
Nick Kew wrote: On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:29:37 -0400 Robert Banfield wrote: Apache Version: 2.2.3 (rpm: httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3) Suggest you start by updating that. 2.2.3 is old, and we've made a number of improvements to the proxy since then. Once you've done that, we can figu

Re: [us...@httpd] ProxyPassing an HTTP PUT request

2009-04-22 Thread Nick Kew
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:29:37 -0400 Robert Banfield wrote: > Apache Version: 2.2.3 (rpm: httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3) Suggest you start by updating that. 2.2.3 is old, and we've made a number of improvements to the proxy since then. Once you've done that, we can figure out whether you have a

[us...@httpd] ProxyPassing an HTTP PUT request

2009-04-22 Thread Robert Banfield
Apache Version: 2.2.3 (rpm: httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3) I am using Apache's proxypass to send requests to a different port on the same machine, but using a different webserver. This works wonderfully for my GET requests, however for a PUT, the request is passed through the proxy and a 100-