Re: [us...@httpd] Want more info about logging works

2010-12-03 Thread Igor Galić
- Jeroen Geilman jer...@adaptr.nl wrote: On 12/01/2010 07:38 PM, ma...@manfbraun.de wrote: Hello ! I am just using this to log: LogFormat \ %{%F %T}t\t%v\t%p\t%h\t%{User-Agent} ... \ vhost_combined2 CustomLog |/usr/bin/mono /test/eco.exe /var/log/apache2/extra_log

Re: [us...@httpd] Want more info about logging works

2010-12-03 Thread Rainer Jung
On 04.12.2010 00:49, Igor Galić wrote: - Jeroen Geilmanjer...@adaptr.nl wrote: On 12/01/2010 07:38 PM, ma...@manfbraun.de wrote: Because the timestamp does not contain milliseconds, how can I determine, which request was the first? Would it help me, just to subtract the processing-time?

Re: [us...@httpd] Want more info about logging works

2010-12-02 Thread Jeroen Geilman
On 12/01/2010 07:38 PM, ma...@manfbraun.de wrote: Hello ! I am just using this to log: LogFormat \ %{%F %T}t\t%v\t%p\t%h\t%{User-Agent} ... \ vhost_combined2 CustomLog |/usr/bin/mono /test/eco.exe /var/log/apache2/extra_log 86400 \ vhost_combined2 Okay. May I

[us...@httpd] Want more info about logging works

2010-12-01 Thread mabra
Hello ! I am just using this to log: LogFormat \ %{%F %T}t\t%v\t%p\t%h\t%{User-Agent} ... \ vhost_combined2 CustomLog |/usr/bin/mono /test/eco.exe /var/log/apache2/extra_log 86400 \ vhost_combined2 May I use just a named pipe? What will happen, it the reader has a short