On 8/28/2012 7:59 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
IIRC, this has always been the behavior of mod_cgid -- anything the
mod_cgid daemon process needs to log is written to its stderr, which
is the main server error log.
Makes sense. Any thoughts on the impact of switching away from an event
based MPM
Morning All,
From the docs at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/logs.html, we have:
If |CustomLog
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/mod_log_config.html#customlog| or
|ErrorLog http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/mod/core.html#errorlog|
directives are placed inside a |VirtualHost
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
Morning All,
From the docs at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/current/logs.html, we have:
If CustomLog or ErrorLog directives are placed inside a VirtualHost
section, all requests or errors for that virtual host will be
On 8/28/2012 11:06 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
The same errors duplicated, or a mix? Are you sure the only local
interface used is 1.2.3.4? If it's munged.com on any other
interface, it won't use that VH.
Different errors and using multiple IPs sorry.
A more complete config file is attached with
Perhaps all the captured stderr is somehow getting redirected to the default
error log? Perhaps something to do with using suexec?
Yes, stderr can only go one place, and it's the main server error log.
This is independent of suexec.
On 8/28/2012 12:15 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
Perhaps all the captured stderr is somehow getting redirected to the default
error log? Perhaps something to do with using suexec?
Yes, stderr can only go one place, and it's the main server error log.
This is independent of suexec.
This changed for
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 8/28/2012 12:15 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
Perhaps all the captured stderr is somehow getting redirected to the
default
error log? Perhaps something to do with using suexec?
Yes, stderr can only go one place, and
On 8/28/2012 12:30 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Are you using mod_cgid or mod_cgi with 2.0 and 2.2?
Aha! No, I don't think so, no. Spot checking a 2.2 server, I do not
have mod_cgi(d). However, on this 2.4 server, I do have mod_cgid
enabled right now because without it, my cgis were not being
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 8/28/2012 12:30 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Are you using mod_cgid or mod_cgi with 2.0 and 2.2?
Aha! No, I don't think so, no. Spot checking a 2.2 server, I do not have
mod_cgi(d). However, on this 2.4 server, I do
On 8/28/2012 1:50 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 8/28/2012 12:30 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Are you using mod_cgid or mod_cgi with 2.0 and 2.2?
Aha! No, I don't think so, no. Spot checking a 2.2 server, I do not have
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 8/28/2012 1:50 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com
wrote:
On 8/28/2012 12:30 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Are you using mod_cgid or mod_cgi with 2.0 and 2.2?
11 matches
Mail list logo