To
users@httpd.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere PlugIn
On Don 20.07.2006 10:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm using a Linux Suse 9.
I would like to use the plugin because it was
written for balancing
throught WebSphere Application
Qingshan Xie wrote:
If the Apache-2.2.2 compiled with mod_so, Apache
should be able to load mod_was_ap20_http.so without
any issue.
Not likely. First, there is a module signature of AP20 in any
module which was compiled under apache 2.0, which absolutely will
not load under apache 2.2 (the
Hi,
On Don 20.07.2006 09:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've compiled Apache 2.2.2 and now I would like to use apache with
websphere plugin to pass requests to a remore WebSphere Application
Server.
Do you really must use the plugin or can you use the proxy-balance
module?
What i mean is if
reverse.
manuciaoThanks
Alexander Lazic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20/07/2006 09.52
Please respond to
users@httpd.apache.org
To
users@httpd.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere
PlugIn
Hi,
On Don 20.07.2006 09:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've
On Don 20.07.2006 10:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using a Linux Suse 9.
I would like to use the plugin because it was written for balancing
throught WebSphere Application Server and I think that if I have a
WebSphere Application server on backend it would be better using its
plugin to
Subject
Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache 2.2.2 and WebSphere
PlugIn
On Don 20.07.2006 10:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using a Linux Suse 9.
I would like to use the plugin because it was written for balancing
throught WebSphere Application Server and I think that if I have a
WebSphere
On Don 20.07.2006 10:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The permission bits for allthe plugin directory are 755.
I'm on Z/linux. But it is the same as in another suse linux version.
Is this the 64 or the 31 bit version?!
My question is if with a compiled apache (and then I don't load modules
LoadModule was_ap20_module
/opt/CHROOT/HTTPD/WebSpherePlugin/bin/mod_was_ap20_http.so
Another possibility is, that mod_was_ap20_http.so was compiled against 2.0.xx
Ask IBM if they have something like mod_was_ap22_http.so
which should be compiled against 2.2.x.
bye
Oliver
-Ursprüngliche
