Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authorization - require question

2007-07-26 Thread Manuel Vacelet
er, Manuel > -Original Message- > From: Manuel Vacelet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: quarta-feira, 25 de Julho de 2007 16:07 > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authorization - require question > > Thanks for the quick reply. > >

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authorization - require question

2007-07-25 Thread Luis Moreira (ESI-GSQP)
el Vacelet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: quarta-feira, 25 de Julho de 2007 16:07 To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authorization - require question Thanks for the quick reply. I do use because of subversion and there is no global permissions set at a upper level. What s

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authorization - require question

2007-07-25 Thread Manuel Vacelet
Thanks for the quick reply. I do use because of subversion and there is no global permissions set at a upper level. What seems strange to me is that "Require user XXX" works w/o having another authorization level (w/o AuthzSVNAccessFile) but as soon as I add this statement the Require user seems

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Authorization - require question

2007-07-25 Thread Luis Moreira (ESI-GSQP)
First, the directive "require user" fits not only a single user, but a list, too Doing just Require user Manuel Vacelet Admin Power Will validate 4 users, Manuel, Vacelet, Admin and Power HOWEVER, 1) Location applies to contents outside the file system 2) Otherwise you can use Directory direc