Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

2007-02-22 Thread Joshua Slive
On 2/22/07, Techguy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just installed Apache 1.3.5 on Windows 2003 Don't do that. Apache 1.3 on Windows is dead. Use 2.2. Jsohua. - The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

2007-02-22 Thread Techguy
1:51 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003 On 2/22/07, Techguy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just installed Apache 1.3.5 on Windows 2003 Don't do that. Apache 1.3 on Windows is dead. Use 2.2. Jsohua

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

2007-02-22 Thread Pid
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joshua Slive Sent: February 22, 2007 1:51 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003 On 2/22/07, Techguy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just installed Apache 1.3.5 on Windows 2003 Don't do that. Apache

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

2007-02-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Pid wrote: Techguy wrote: It works, PHP doesn't - and since I have 1.3 on my Linux box I want to keep them the same, and I don't plan on upgrading Linux. If it isn't broke, don't mess with it. If you are really running apache 1.3.5 on your linux box, and corresponding software from that

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

2007-02-22 Thread Evan Platt
At 11:54 AM 2/22/2007, Techguy wrote: It works, PHP doesn't - and since I have 1.3 on my Linux box I want to keep them the same, and I don't plan on upgrading Linux. If it isn't broke, don't mess with it. With security holes, exploits, etc, do you REALLY want to run a OLD version of Apache?

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

2007-02-22 Thread Techguy
cases are much worse. Thanks -Original Message- From: Pid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 22, 2007 3:26 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003 Techguy wrote: It works, PHP doesn't - and since I have 1.3 on my Linux

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Lavi
, and in many cases are much worse. Thanks -Original Message- From: Pid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 22, 2007 3:26 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003 Techguy wrote: It works, PHP doesn't - and since I have 1.3 on my Linux

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

2007-02-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Techguy wrote: Now that everyone has got their opinions out of the way of how behind I am, is their a way to get this to work? To the person who said I doubt it's your box anymore, Why?? It is and it works, and to WOW everyone even more, it's running beautifully on a 366 with 256 megs of ram.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

2007-02-22 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Techguy wrote: I used this website to configure PHP. http://www.thesitewizard.com/archive/php4install.shtml He last updated that 7 March 2003. Maybe you should ask him? Or perhaps read modern instructions instead. - The

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

2007-02-22 Thread Mark Lavi
:56 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003 Techguy wrote: Now that everyone has got their opinions out of the way of how behind I am, is their a way to get this to work? To the person who said I doubt it's your box anymore, Why

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003

2007-02-22 Thread Techguy
not necessarily mean better, and in many cases are much worse. Thanks -Original Message- From: Pid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 22, 2007 3:26 PM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Installing Apache 1.3 on Windows 2003 Techguy wrote: It works, PHP doesn't