RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

2005-11-14 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
, or whether it is shared among worker processes. -ascs -Original Message- From: Matthew R. Hamilton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 12:12 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache Josh, I enabled LogLevel debug

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

2005-11-09 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/9/05, Matthew R. Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking to set up some caching apache servers to offload commonly accessed static content. We had been using IBM's WebSphere Edge Components 5.0.2 until we started experiancing issues where the ibmproxy process would constantly

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

2005-11-09 Thread Matthew R. Hamilton
Joshua, I believe I found the error of my ways about an hour after this post. I miss-read the documentation in regards to the CacheEnable setting. I initially read this as to the physical location on the file system that contains the items I want cached. I was wondering why the example had

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

2005-11-09 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/9/05, Matthew R. Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there anything out there that will help me verify cache hits and misses? I thought I answered that: Change LogLevel to debug and look in the error log to determine if mod_cache is active. (You can also log the Age HTTP Response

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

2005-11-09 Thread Matthew R. Hamilton
Josh, I enabled LogLevel debug and below is the output from the error log: - [Wed Nov 09 16:27:48 2005] [debug] /home/gatekeeper/minfrin/rpm/BUILD/httpd-2.0.50/server/mpm/prefork/prefork.c(955): AcceptMutex: sysvsem (default: sysvsem) [Wed Nov

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Question about mod_cache

2005-11-09 Thread Joshua Slive
On 11/9/05, Matthew R. Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Josh, I enabled LogLevel debug and below is the output from the error log: And when the browser requests the images again. I assume since I see age values in the reply that these messages are just part of the debug information.