Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web server fail over setup

2007-10-04 Thread Asrai khn
On 10/3/07, Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No matter which solution you choose, the real problem is to detect that the server fails. If the server stops responding to requests, that's easy enough. However if there is not a clear-cut failure, e.g. one server gradually slows

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web server fail over setup

2007-10-03 Thread Christian Folini
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:04:29PM +0500, Asrai khn wrote: So I am looking for suggestions how to make his failures of web server less pain. Lot of suggestions are possible, but they all inflict pain. A very clean and widspread solution is to have two identical webservers (use a deployment

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web server fail over setup

2007-10-03 Thread Peter Milanese
Hey- I ran LVS for about 5 years, mostly while it was in its infancy. We do over a billion hits a year, and I had it running on VERY small machines, heading 4 others with many Vhosts. It cost a couple of grand for the two boxes. The result of this was proof that we needed the solution,

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web server fail over setup

2007-10-03 Thread Axel-Stéphane SMORGRAV
octobre 2007 14:33 À : users@httpd.apache.org Objet : Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web server fail over setup On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 05:04:29PM +0500, Asrai khn wrote: So I am looking for suggestions how to make his failures of web server less pain. Lot of suggestions are possible, but they all