RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] install problem on solaris

2008-08-04 Thread Matthew Shaw
EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 5 August 2008 10:23 AM To: users@httpd.apache.org Cc: Matthew Shaw Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] install problem on solaris Matthew, YES! I had exactly the same problems. I have a very strange solution... Edit the /srclib/apr-util/Makefile and change: in

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] install problem on solaris

2008-08-04 Thread Dan_Mitton
Matthew, YES! I had exactly the same problems. I have a very strange solution... Edit the /srclib/apr-util/Makefile and change: install-modules: install-modules-yes to: install-modules: install-modules-no I can't tell you why, only that it seemed to work and the modules were still install

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install issues

2008-05-15 Thread Mark Murphy
Ok, must be something with the 2.2.8 install. I uninstalled 2.2.8, and installed 2.0.63. Now everything is working properly. Any ideas? Mark Murphy wrote: This may or may not be an install issue. I downloaded the most recent version of Apache 2.2.8 (Win32). I downloaded the installer, and

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install issues

2008-05-14 Thread Mark Murphy
I have done several things to resolve this, but no joy. 1) I tried disabling Windows Personal Firewall 2) I rebooted 3) I changed the logging level to debug This resulted in the following log: [Wed May 14 07:50:41 2008] [notice] Parent: Received restart signal -- Restarting the server.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install question 2.2.6

2007-12-06 Thread Sander Temme
On Dec 6, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Adrian Greeman wrote: Any advice on how to check the port in use and why the symbol does not appear? Is it something to be concerned about? The port in use is determined by the Listen directive in Apache's configuration file. You can quickly find that by going

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] install CD for Enterprise Linux 4

2007-11-26 Thread Dragon
lx7 wrote: Any ideas? Or alternate solutions? End original message. - Not trying to be rude but you are asking in the wrong place. Go to a forum or list that supports Redhat. This one is for the Apache web server and related projects. It is doubtful you

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] install mystery

2007-03-17 Thread Brian A. Seklecki
What did you set --prefix to during ./configure? Did you "find / -name *httpd.conf*" The config template that comes in the Apache src is going to need more hand work than the one that comes with the FBSD port. Shoot me an e-mail offline about your Ports problems (just fwd me messages) and I'll o

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] install

2006-09-17 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: Carl Wenrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 4:44 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] install > > When I run netstat -a | grep '*.80' I get nothing. Well, I don'

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] install

2006-09-15 Thread Carl Wenrich
Pv6   4485       TCP *:www (LISTEN)Boyle Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message-> From: Carl Wenrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 2:00 AM> To: users@httpd.apache.org> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] install> > There wer

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] install

2006-09-14 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: Carl Wenrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 2:00 AM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] install > > There were no errors on the command line. I also thought > everything went f

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] install

2006-09-14 Thread Carl Wenrich
There were no errors on the command line. I also thought everything went fine at first. I ran make, and then make install. Again, no errors. But when I tried to start the server, I got messages saying that (98) Address already in use, make_sock could not bind to address ...80, and no listening

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] install

2006-09-14 Thread Sander Temme
On Sep 14, 2006, at 4:32 PM, Carl Wenrich wrote: I'm trying to install the latest version (from source) and the config log tells me there are a number of fatal errors. The config.log.tar.gz is attached. Please advise. configure: exit 0 Not seeing any errors. Looks like the configure proce

RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install / setup troubles

2006-05-04 Thread Boyle Owen
> -Original Message- > From: Bill Angus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 10:17 PM > To: users@httpd.apache.org > Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install / setup troubles > > Dear Vasiliy: > > It seems that I am getting an error message in the log file > that [warn]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install failure on WinXP

2005-10-09 Thread Joshua Kogut
Hey! Just use the noinstall archive for win32 systems. It always works for me.On 10/4/05, Bob Hartung <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:Hi all,   No flame please.  I tried to install the latest apache for Windows and when I start the installer it just hangs.  All firewall andantivirus software is turned o

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Install failure on WinXP

2005-10-04 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
First, be sure you have TCP/IP correctly installed, then review http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/TROUBLESHOOTING.html Bob Hartung wrote: Hi all, No flame please. I tried to install the latest apache for Windows and when I start the installer it just hangs. All firewall and a