than my previous setup.
I'll monitor over the next week and see if it stays at that level.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Marsh [mailto:adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com]
Sent: 07 April 2009 14:23
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
Thanks guys
previous setup.
I'll monitor over the next week and see if it stays at that level.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Marsh [mailto:adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com]
Sent: 07 April 2009 14:23
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
Thanks guys for the help so far
Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Sean Conner s...@conman.org wrote:
It was thus said that the Great Eric Covener once stated:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Adrian Marsh
adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com wrote:
Am trying MaxMemFree 3(30mb? - pure guess number).
Far too
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:31 AM, André Warnier a...@ice-sa.com wrote:
The wasted stack space doesn't shows up as a high VSZ, but not RSS.
Eric, as written that note above is rather cryptic..
Maybe removing double/triple negatives would help ?
;-)
Lost all meaning in an edit, strike the
if the problem still occurs. If it does, then I
may have an official support route to follow.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 April 2009 01:50
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:54
April 2009 01:50
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Sean Conner s...@conman.org wrote:
It was thus said that the Great Eric Covener once stated:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Adrian Marsh
adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com wrote
: 03 April 2009 16:51
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Adrian Marsh
adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com wrote:
Am trying MaxMemFree 3 (30mb? - pure guess number).
Far too large, it's per-thread. Try 1MB.
--
Eric Covener
cove
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 7:54 PM, Sean Conner s...@conman.org wrote:
It was thus said that the Great Eric Covener once stated:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Adrian Marsh
adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com wrote:
Am trying MaxMemFree 3 (30mb? - pure guess number).
Far too large, it's
Adrian Marsh wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to track down an issue I have with our apache server. Its a
poweredge 1800, RHEL5x64 server, running httpd-2.2.3-22.el5. Its mainly
used as a subversion repository, via HTTPS with LDAP lookup for
authentication.
All was well with the system, running
it is (as others
running 1.5.5 don't report this issue). It's a fairly vanilla httpd setup
other than the svn config.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Sent: 03 April 2009 10:37
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Adrian Marsh adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com wrote:
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the reply. No its definitely the httpd process. I see each thread
consuming hundreds of megs of RES memory being used in TOP. I just restarted
it and already each is consuming:
10006
-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 April 2009 14:06
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Adrian Marsh adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com wrote:
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the reply. No its definitely the httpd process
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:58 +0100, Adrian Marsh wrote:
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the reply. No its definitely the httpd process. I see each thread
consuming hundreds of megs of RES memory being used in TOP. I just restarted
it and already each is consuming:
10006 apache15 0 279m
-
From: Tom Evans [mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 03 April 2009 14:16
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Cc: a...@ice-sa.com
Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:58 +0100, Adrian Marsh wrote:
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the reply. No its definitely the httpd
...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:58 +0100, Adrian Marsh wrote:
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the reply. No its definitely the httpd process. I see each thread
consuming hundreds of megs of RES memory being used in TOP. I just restarted
it and already each is consuming:
10006
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Adrian Marsh [mailto:adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 3. April 2009 15:26
An: users@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: RE: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
Hi Christian,
Do you think you could ask them to see if they resolved it?
I had similar thoughts, so
@httpd.apache.org
Cc: a...@ice-sa.com
Betreff: RE: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 13:58 +0100, Adrian Marsh wrote:
Hi Andre,
Thanks for the reply. No its definitely the httpd process. I see each thread
consuming hundreds of megs of RES memory being used in TOP. I just
: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Adrian Marsh
adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com wrote:
To get that memory back I have to reboot the server.
As a previous poster said, if stopping Apache (and watching all the
httpd process go away) doesn't reclaim the memory
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:24 +0100, Adrian Marsh wrote:
Hi Tom,
Well, at the moment the servers running very low on available memory:
Mem: 12307068k total, 12121380k used, 185688k free, 286808k buffers
Swap: 2031608k total,0k used, 2031608k free, 11081692k cached
Hence my
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Adrian Marsh
adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com wrote:
Am trying MaxMemFree 3 (30mb? - pure guess number).
Far too large, it's per-thread. Try 1MB.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
-
The
-Original Message-
From: Eric Covener [mailto:cove...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 April 2009 16:51
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Adrian Marsh
adrian.ma...@ubiquisys.com wrote:
Am trying MaxMemFree 3 (30mb? - pure
Message-
From: Tom Evans [mailto:tevans...@googlemail.com]
Sent: 03 April 2009 16:21
To: users@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [us...@httpd] Apache memory hog
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:24 +0100, Adrian Marsh wrote:
Hi Tom,
Well, at the moment the servers running very low on available memory
22 matches
Mail list logo
